8 Feb 2019
Softlanding Solutions Response
7yFirstly, I would like to say that we value all feedback: positive or negative. So, I thank you for the obvious effort you put into your posting. Secondly, I am in complete agreement that providing time-sensitive technical support and occasional on-call coverage can be stressful and is not a good fit for everyone. That is exactly how I started my IT career, so I can speak to that first-hand. I have seen this happen multiple times over the years, just as I’ve seen the reverse be true: some personalities get quickly bored in too low stress roles. Unfortunately, these things sometimes don’t get picked up by either side during interviews. It appears this was a collective miss in this case.
One thing I would like to clarify, whether it be a misunderstanding or actual disagreement. Our $300 weekly on-call compensation is meant to only cover up to 4 hours of after-hours support effort. Anything above that is compensated as additional overtime, or time off in-lieu. This means that if there is actually 4 hours of effort put in over a week, that time is compensated at the equivalent of $75 per hour. If less effort is spent it works out even higher. It is standby compensation, just differently packaged. When we did our research for implementing this policy, we found it to be on the high end of industry average for this type of support. That said, continuous improvement is a core value we believe in strongly. Your comments suggest this is a policy that should be reviewed from that mindset. Thank you for that feedback.
Finally, I understand that public airing of this type would typically constitute “burning a bridge”, but I also know the stress of role misalignment can create a stronger emotional reaction than might otherwise be the case; more like thorn-lensed glasses versus rose-coloured ones. Airing grievance can be emotionally cathartic, I have experienced the same in my own past. I also know that despite the role not being the right fit, you demonstrated some strong technical skills during your short tenure with us. My understanding is there was mutual consensus during your exit interview as to the types of roles that would be a good fit. We also suggested that should you be seeking those types of roles we would be more than happy to provide a positive reference. I give you my personal word that we will stand by that commitment, should you still wish to exercise it.
Hopefully we have all learned something from our collective experience, and I truly wish you all the best with finding the right home for your skills.
Best regards,
Shaun Roberts
President, Softlanding Solutions Inc.