A lot to like. Some to avoid. - Anonymous employee Testlio Employee Review

3.0
10 May 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The opportunity to meet and work with people from all over the world in a intimate setting is special. The founders are good people and the team is good. The Estonian group in particular is tightly knit and full of individuals who I came to appreciate and care about. There is what I would describe as a feminine energy to the company that is genuine. While I am not personally sold on the long-term prospects of the company (it is a space where price is too much of a factor, and the sort of 'reverse offshoring' operating model is hard to scale without becoming inequitable), I don't regret my time here. I think it is probably a good place to be mid-term, and that if the cards are played right, the company will eventually be bought by another, larger company and people will do pretty well off of their equity.

Cons

Be cautious if you're going to be non-technical or work near the CEO. If you are outside of the Americas or in a technical role, that's a better deal. The team you are on determines the experience you will have. More than that, your organizational distance to the CEO is key. The CEO very much runs things day-to-day, whereas the founders have taken a step back/been pushed back over the past few years. Certain parts of the company that are closer to the CEO's background (operations/sales/marketing) are ruled by the CEO's whims and ego. While this individual has worked to better themselves, I witnessed outbursts, fits of impulsiveness, and gaslighting that are indicative of how difficult it is for people to change, and to appreciate the perspectives, aspirations, situations, knowledge, and experiences of others who are different from or have less than they do. I do not think the CEO's leadership and manner are healthy for the company long-term, or healthy for anyone close to the CEO organizationally, who is deemed by the CEO as less-than, or that the CEO takes a keen interest in. It is a bad idea to get on the CEO's radar, or to in any way challenge their decisions, set and often outdated ways of thinking, or authority. Do so, and the 'real' CEO will emerge. And it is unpleasant. I witnesses some truly twisted decision-making, dynamics, and relationships that were far more subtle and toxic than any other workplace I've been a part of, all tied to the CEO. These are hard to see unless you're subjected to them because of the distributed work model and compartmentalization of individual teams. Fortunately I was not impacted as directly as some others were. I now get why they left or were targeted for layoffs, and why they acted the way they did as they left. At the end of the day, any among the $2M Austin Mansion Tech Class are going to have a pretty thick reality distortion bubble built of their own experience and money. These are competitive bunch driven by a vaguely progressive materialism. No amount of lipstick on the pig and faux-zen mannerisms and word choice can totally blot out the realities of well-off, mean-spirited people. Even ones who do try to at least act better. I would rather deal with regular, not so nice people. They're easier to compartmentalize and dismiss.

avatar
Testlio Response
3y
Hello, this is Steve, CEO of Testlio. To start: I take responsibility for, and apologize for, actions of mine that have hurt you and/or others. When your review was published, I immediately surfaced it to our founders and board of directors. They reviewed it and we have discussed it. I’ve also asked key members of my leadership team to reflect upon it and offer me their insights. I offer my personal reply today, May 16, 2023. To begin, your comment of “do try to at least act better” does a good job of capturing my journey. I have natural and learned wiring that pushes me to work hard, operate competitively, and “challenge things” (per Testlio’s values). The shadow-side of this wiring is that I am sometimes hard on people, as you call out. What you describe as “outbursts” can be me at my worst, allowing my frustrations to come through in ways that aren’t aligned with my leadership principles. For any outbursts you have seen or experienced, I apologize. My competitiveness can help companies perform well financially. For example, Testlio grew revenue 5x during my first 4 years as CEO while we brought the business from losing money to profitability for 3 of those 4 years. Going forward, my goal is to maintain my drive and eliminate behaviors that can be viewed as outbursts. You also use the terms “impulsiveness” and “gaslighting” in your review. I’d like to address both. While I acknowledge that at times I can seem impulsive in an individual situation (e.g. a small team Zoom meeting), I hold that I am generally a thoughtful leader. What might seem impulsive usually comes from a deeper place where I’m seeing something that doesn’t seem to be working well for our company and/or I’m concerned about a decision we’re about to make. Further, if you spend time with my direct reports and work with me over long periods of time, I think you gain a fuller perspective of how I generally am not impulsive on critical decisions (sometimes to the frustration of people who want me to make important choices faster). I also hold that my team will tell you that I’m pretty good at changing my mind based on updated situations and broad input. Please also note that several members of the Testlio team have known and worked with me for more than 15 years (a few across multiple companies). Additionally, I originally met the Founders of Testlio in 2013, advised them from 2014-2018, and joined Testlio full-time in 2018. They offer this quote today: “Over our decade-long collaboration, Steve’s impact on our company has been transformative. From the early stages of Testlio, his involvement, investment, and ongoing guidance have propelled our growth. As CEO, Steve inspires us to embrace growth, fosters a supportive work culture, and prioritizes diversity and inclusion. Our trust and dedication to him in this role remains steadfast and unshaken.” - Kristel and Marko Kruustük, co-founders and board directors, Testlio. Additionally, in my 4.5 years at Testlio as CEO I’ve had mostly consistent direct reports. The average tenure of my executive leadership team during my time at Testlio is 3 years, noting that 5 members of my team have been with me the whole time I’ve been at Testlio. Turning to “gaslighting,” it’s a phrase that is being used more in American businesses. One definition of gaslighting is “a specific type of manipulation where the manipulator is trying to get someone else (or a group of people) to question their own reality, memory or perceptions.” But there are other uses of gaslighting, inclusive of concepts like, “invalidating something you’ve just said” or “questioning the veracity of your statements.” Before your review, I’ve never been told that I use gaslighting. Today, I asked seven members of the Testlio team, along with my wife of 25 years, if they have ever seen me gaslight someone or experienced gaslighting themselves. They all said no. Stepping back, if I take the first definition of “manipulation” I also struggle to see examples of gaslighting at Testlio (my own or others). But if I take a looser definition of “invalidating” or “questioning”, and I think about the context of power dynamics, then I can see situations where some of my actions could be experienced as gaslighting. For this, I’m sorry. To you, and to others. In closing, thank you for your perspectives. Aspects of what you provided encouraged me to recommit to my personal and leadership journey. Looking ahead, I offer this pledge: I commit to being open to feedback, coaching, perspectives, and input. I actively seek and appreciate specific call-outs on my behaviors. I continue to work on my shortcomings and strive to avoid doing harm to others. Sincerely, Steve CEO Testlio Inc.

Explore other reviews about Testlio

5.0
3 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The renewed company focus allows teams to prioritize effectively and maintain alignment. The leadership team is grounded, motivated, and highly collaborative. The product strategy successfully embraces AI, positioning the company to define the future of AI testing.

Cons

The volume of organizational change over the past year was a bit high. While these pivots were clearly made to ensure both near and long-term success, so much change can lead to change fatigue. I believe that leadership maintaining the current level of transparency will be key as the org continues to stabilize under the new focus.

4.0
8 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great, friendly culture to be a remote first company.

Cons

HQ is based in Estonia so things can be slow when needing technical support with platform if youre based in US

avatar
Testlio Response
1w
Thanks for taking the time to rate your experience at Testlio!
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All