employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Alan Turing Institute

Engaged employer

Very bad - Research Assistant The Alan Turing Institute Employee Review

1.0
20 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Convenient location. Good quality office. Good benefits package.

Cons

A relatively young research institute. HR policies and processes have not caught up yet. Neither has the calibre of the senior management. Below the glossy surface you find capricious behaviours, malicious criticism and sarcasm in face-to-face interactions. A toxic culture. The institute offers an external mental health counselling service but nobody addresses the root causes of the poor mental health of the staff. Senior staff take no responsibility for their decisions or actions. Everything is always the fault of the junior members. Poor communication. Lack of support. Lack of professional processes. Lack of professionalism. Micromanagement. A pretty much pointless HR department. My understanding is that there are known repeat offenders here that are, for some reason, immune from any HR action. The Alan Turing Institute revolves around a “privileged” core group of people that joined around the time it was founded. Everyone else is treated as a dispensable commodity. Professional processes and integrity do not seem to apply to them. And all this is on charity money. If you are brave enough to take up a job here make sure that you will be paid because not everyone gets paid in their first month. And nobody cares. The institute mostly works with contractors. It has no long-term approach towards its staff. If you are looking for a stable long-term position, make sure you give this one a miss. Definitely do not turn down other job offers for this one. Taking up a job here has been one of my big mistakes and I hope that this review will make others think twice before they decide to work for this institute. Do not let unprofessional people waste your time and your money.

Explore other reviews about The Alan Turing Institute

5.0
25 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Top notch projects of national importance, great group of people.

Cons

Location should be changed. They should build their own campus.

1.0
28 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free drink in the office Talented staff

Cons

Lack of clear vision and strategic direction from leadership, they have a very limited understanding of how teams actually operate day-to-day. The transformation and new structure were implemented without meaningful consultation with team leads, particularly around operational needs and how work is delivered in practice. This has resulted in decisions that disconnected from reality and have not addressed the core challenges teams face. While the intention has been to reduce silos, the outcome has been the opposite. Teams are now operating in more isolated ways than before, with less clarity on responsibilities and collaboration across functions. There has been a lack of care and consideration for staff throughout this transformation process. Redundancies have impacted individuals regardless of tenure, including those who were only recently recruited. For those remaining, workloads have increased significantly beyond their original scope, in order to cover gaps left by redundancies. It is also difficult to reconcile the organisation’s stated commitment to EDI with decisions such as making the EDI team redundant. Although the transformation has been described as complete, there is little evidence of tangible improvement. In many areas, processes and ways of working appear to have deteriorated rather than improved. Millions has been made into the ERP system, yet they do not appear to meet basic operational needs. Its ironic to see this at the national AI and data science research institute. The work culture feels more distant and less transparent. There is limited visibility into how decisions are made, and communication lacks clarity and consistency. This has contributed to a sense of disconnect between leadership and staff, and has impacted overall trust and engagement.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All