Cool organization that changed for the worse - Anonymous employee Unavco Employee Review

2.0
3 Jun 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great science is being accomplished by this non-profit consortium. Funded by the National Science Foundation. Most employees are interesting and outdoor oriented. They manage a large GPS instrument network and help scientists install temporary and fixed stations to measure movements in the earth's crust. Became independent from UCAR in the early 2000's. Is a good environment for Directors and above and junior-level staff.

Cons

During the last three years management has reorganized its organization into a rigid hierarchical structure that has more in common large commercial organizations. The half a dozen senior management personal have wide ranging authority. The middle management has little independent authority and limited visibility. Moral is poor among a large number of staff and they have experience vacancies of key personal in recent years.

Explore other reviews about Unavco

5.0
7 Feb 2022
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great people, well-managed - Connected with professionals in academia and industry

Cons

- Office is a bit out of the way

3.0
4 Dec 2008
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

UNAVCO is very well respected by the science community. The science areas supported by UNAVCO are cutting edge and are growing. The environment is more academic then business, providing a more relaxed working environment. Jobs seem to be fairly stable since funding is in 5 year cycles. Benefits are very competitive, while compensation is a bit lower than similar types of science supported Government funded organizations. A good way stop in one's path toward a PhD.

Cons

External appearances are misleading. Management is old styled and non-supportive of current management practices (collaboration, transparency, inclusiveness, communication). With the new president some of these issues are being addressed; time will tell. The organization is fairly flat which also means career opportunities (promotions) are limited (so this is a positive and negative). HR is rudimentary and not always competent.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All