employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Unleashed Brands

Is this your company?

The most toxic and dysfunctional organization I have worked for in my career. - Director of Marketing Unleashed Brands Employee Review

1.0
1 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A few talented employees who genuinely care and do their best despite the environment.

Cons

This was easily the most frustrating, disappointing, toxic and dysfunctional organizations I have worked for in my career. The expectations placed on employees were completely unrealistic. Leadership regularly demanded significant growth and results while failing to provide the resources, staffing, budget, or organizational structure necessary to achieve those goals. When goals were missed, the response was often to look for someone to blame rather than address the underlying issues. Management was inconsistent, reactive, and frequently disconnected from the day-to-day realities of the business. Priorities changed constantly, projects were started and abandoned, and employees were expected to pivot repeatedly without clear direction. There was little accountability at the leadership and c-suite level, yet employees were held to impossible standards. The culture was equally disappointing. Instead of collaboration and teamwork, there was a strong undercurrent of office politics, gossip, and self-preservation. Some coworkers appeared more focused on protecting themselves, creating drama, or undermining others than actually working together toward shared goals. Employees who raised concerns or challenged decisions often felt punished, ignored, or treated differently afterward. As a Marketing Director, I was frequently expected to fix problems that originated in other departments. Marketing became the scapegoat for issues that were far outside its control. Successes were often overlooked, while failures—regardless of the actual cause—were quickly assigned to whoever was most convenient to blame. Communication from leadership was extremely poor. Expectations were rarely clear, feedback was inconsistent, and decisions were often made without input from the people responsible for executing them. The result was confusion, frustration, and constant fire-drills. Employee morale suffered because of the lack of trust throughout the organization. Turnover was high, burnout was common, and many talented employees eventually left. The environment often felt less like a professional workplace and more like a political game where relationships mattered more than performance. There are good people throughout the company, but good employees can only overcome so much. Without significant changes to leadership, accountability, communication, and culture, I would not recommend working here. Poor management, unrealistic expectations, blame culture, office politics, vindictive behavior, constant turnover, lack of accountability, poor communication, and employee burnout.

Explore other reviews about Unleashed Brands

5.0
21 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly staff, supportive atmosphere, creative environment

Cons

My commute is long, more than 25 miles each way.

1.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible PTO when allowed to take it.

Cons

Worked at Unleashed Brands during a period of extremely high turnover and organizational change within the accounting department. At one point, I was the second longest-tenured employee on the team with only around 9 months of tenure, which speaks to the level of instability and retention issues. The accounting close cycle regularly stretched 20–25 days, making it difficult to stay ahead of current work while simultaneously managing prior month responsibilities. As employees left and roles were consolidated, workloads continued to expand with very little ability to push back or deprioritize tasks. Expectations frequently shifted, priorities changed often, and there was a significant lack of documented processes or standardized procedures, making training and consistency difficult across the department. Management responsiveness to questions and requests for clarification was also inconsistent, which created additional frustration in an already fast-paced environment. Employees were often expected to navigate changing responsibilities without clear guidance or sufficient support. There were also conflicting expectations around priorities — employees could be told to immediately stop their own work to assist other team members, while still being evaluated on personal KPIs and deadlines tied to their individual productivity and progress. This created confusion around performance expectations and made it difficult to consistently succeed in the role. Employees were initially sold on autonomy and ownership within their roles, but the environment gradually shifted into a much more team-dependent structure with changing expectations that were not always clearly communicated. PTO policies and flexibility also seemed to vary depending on leadership interpretation, which created confusion and frustration among employees. The return-to-office decision appeared to accelerate turnover significantly, with many positions vacated or eliminated following the change.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All