Salary review - Senior Software Engineer Verisk Employee Review

3.0
7 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Time for self learning skills

Cons

Annual salary compensation lower than expected

avatar
Verisk Response
2y
Hi, thank you for your feedback. We are so happy to hear that you are pleased with the time and opportunities for advancing your self-learning skills at Verisk. We take your feedback seriously. As a result of feedback received through leadership from employees and the most recent engagement survey, we implemented a series of improvements, enhancements, and innovations to our learning and development programs. Your feedback on compensation is valuable. When it comes to compensation and benefits, our work is never done. We constantly strive to offer fair and competitive pay to ensure they align with industry standards. If you have specific concerns or suggestions, we welcome you to contact your manager or HRBP.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All