Meaningful work overshadowed by poor leadership and treatment - Member Services Agent Vida Health Employee Review

2.0
26 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The job itself was meaningful and I enjoyed helping members.

Cons

I did not leave because of the work. I left because of the leadership in Member Services. For a company this size, it is shocking how poorly the front line is treated. Member Services reps are the people speaking directly with members and helping shape the company’s image every single day, yet they are often treated more like peons than professionals. There is little real respect, little recognition, and almost no meaningful investment in their growth. The leads and supervisors were a major reason people left. They seemed far more focused on metrics, monitoring, and looking busy than actually helping the people doing the frontline work. When agents asked for help in Slack with member questions or system issues, leadership was often slow to respond or did not respond at all. Many times, other team members ended up helping instead of the people whose job it was to lead. There was also very little emotional intelligence in how the team was managed. Feedback usually came when something was wrong, not when someone was doing well or trying to grow. The environment felt cold, dismissive, and discouraging. It is hard to stay motivated when leadership does the bare minimum and expects frontline staff to carry the weight without real support. The Director did not seem to listen in any meaningful way either. Input from the front line was acknowledged politely, but it rarely went anywhere. The leadership culture felt full of people telling leadership what they wanted to hear instead of actually advocating for Member Services reps. What made my decision final was when I received an opportunity with a competitor. I told my supervisor and lead manager, and she said she would check to see whether they could offer me a raise to stay. She never followed up and never came back to me. She also was not willing to be a reference. I still got the new job, and leaving Vida was one of the best decisions I made. Another thing employees notice is the imbalance in compensation. Vida used to offer commission for frontline roles, then removed it. At the same time, senior leadership roles are posted with very high salaries, while the frontline team that is expected to make Vida look good to members is paid far less and treated as far less important. Executive leadership needs to stop wondering why turnover is high in Member Services and start looking honestly at the people managing that department. People do not leave bad jobs. They leave bad management. That is exactly what is happening here.

Explore other reviews about Vida Health

5.0
18 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong support from leads; able to bill in full for no shows; independent, contract work; clients can be motivated and wonderful

Cons

very silo'd and not a lot of collaboration with other RDs; inconsistent pay due to inconsistent hours

2.0
20 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fully remote, decent pay at $21/hr, and the interview and onboarding process moved quickly.

Cons

The role is advertised as a member services position but functions as a sales role. When a new hire directly asked the trainer about this, he denied it was sales but described the job as convincing members to enroll in the program. When your primary objective is persuading someone to sign up for something they didn't ask about, that is sales regardless of what you call it. The job description lists the position as seasonal, but during the interview they describe it as a probationary period. Those are two very different things legally and professionally. Make of that what you will. The inconsistencies don't stop there. Equipment is not shipped until after you pass your assessments, meaning you work on your personal device until that happens. Starting with a cohort of only six agents raised immediate questions about how many people actually make it through the full two weeks. By day two, a Proof of Learning assessment about the CRM platform is required with a passing score of 90 or above. Two agents had to retake an entire 60 question quiz for missing the mark by one or two points. By day three, a live demo Proof of Learning covering two platforms simultaneously is required with a senior agent as observer. When new hires expressed feeling unprepared, the trainer said the training is designed to see if agents can work under pressure. While most people have different learning patterns and speeds, expecting new hires to follow and apply procedures from over 100 slides, videos, and materials within 48 to 72 hours does not reflect a reasonable training standard by any measure. It places unnecessary pressure on agents before they even make it past the live demo assessment. And if you stumble along the way, the margin for grace is slim. On day one, a colleague was terminated because her camera kept flickering due to a tech issue. She was clearly present, visible, and actively participating. Rather than offering a temporary solution, they let her go. That set the tone for everything that followed. Micromanagement is the management style, Slack availability is monitored, and camera enforcement is taken very seriously. The structural dysfunction is consistent and well documented, as the reviews will confirm. If chaos is your love language, you will feel right at home. For a company founded in 2014 to still be operating from a startup standpoint over a decade later is concerning and speaks to a deeper internal and operational issue that has yet to be addressed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All