Good work life balance with stagnant growth - Software Developer TL onsemi Employee Review

4.0
13 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- **Good Work-Life Balance:** The company has historically maintained a good work-life balance, allowing employees to manage their personal and professional commitments effectively. - **Workload:** The workload is substantial, which can be seen as an opportunity for those looking to immerse themselves in their projects and make a significant impact.

Cons

- **Stagnant Growth:** Career progression can feel stagnant, with limited opportunities for advancement or diversification of skills. - **Compensation:** Annual pay raises are modest, which may not align with the market standards or individual expectations of growth. - **Bonus Policy:** The bonus policy is tied to goals that may not always reflect individual performance or contributions, leading to dissatisfaction among some employees. - **Increasing Workload:** There is a concern that the previously mentioned good work-life balance is being eroded due to an increase in workload, which could affect employee satisfaction and retention.

Explore other reviews about onsemi

5.0
13 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company is focused on meaningful, long‑term impact, and you truly feel that the work you do matters—especially given onsemi’s role in power, automotive, and industrial technologies.

Cons

Like many large global companies, alignment across regions and functions can take time.

1.0
25 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company offers good pay and benefits. I also had the chance to work with many capable and supportive peers at the same level, which made the day-to-day work more manageable.

Cons

The work environment can feel highly political. The system tends to encourage people to compete or protect themselves instead of collaborating and helping each other succeed. This often creates unnecessary tension between teams and individuals. Local management also needs significant improvement. Instead of helping remove roadblocks and making the work more efficient, they often add extra processes, tasks, and requirements that do not always contribute to the real goal: improving quality and getting meaningful work done. There is a lot of focus on activities that look good on paper, but not enough support for the actual work needed to ensure quality and execution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All