GSMA Reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(346 total reviews)

Vivek Badrinath

Not enough data to show CEO approval

86% positive business outlook

GSMA has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 346 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The GSMA employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Telecommunications industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

346 reviews
3.0
14 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

International platform with leading industry position

Cons

Outcome should have been better, lots of time were wasted in internal communications before a decision was made.

2.0
25 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Historically there had been good opportunities for travel (depending team politics) and a culture of flexible working which allowed for reasonable work-life balance. There were also the in-office perks like free fruit, pastries and drinks, as well as semi-regular drinks events in the London office... I'm not sure about other offices. Given the geographical reach of the GSMA offices and the global membership base, it was also a fantastic cross-cultural experience working with colleagues and stakeholders from every corner of the world. The majority of the 'do-ers' (junior to middle-management) plus a couple of exceptions at senior management level were deeply invested in impact their work had, and had supportive relationships with colleagues. There was also a sense of pride in the quality and reputation of our events.

Cons

Where to begin? Fundamentally the Leadership Team and Extended Leadership Team (ELT) have lost all sense of direction. The heady effects of cushy jobs, high profile personal platforms, global influence and a disinterested Board have led to an environment where departmental impact is measured and rewarded but individual Leadership are not accountable for their own performance. The organisation experienced a decade+ of rapid expansion, but without the essential leadership traits of integrity, courage and commitment to their own personal and professional growth, this expansion has exacerbated the dysfunction of those leaders. Initially Mats’ introduction of values and industry purpose was well received by staff and provided a ‘north star’ in aligning various parts of the organisation, but over recent years staff have become increasingly disillusioned with his perceived unwillingness to engage in the actual business of leading the organisation – specifically in dealing with his C-level direct reports and their dysfunctional teams – rather opting to pursue what was openly discussed within the organisation (including by C-levels!) as his efforts to secure his next role in the UN or Swedish government. His lack of desire to show up for staff was evident in his unwillingness to engage meaningful in the consistently abysmal staff survey scores on senior leadership year after year after year, or to deal with the systemic issues within HR. At the beginning of 2020 he berated staff on an All Staff call for continuing to complain about senior leadership behaviour... “We have the values on the wall and on coffee mugs”. Hello news flash – Values 101 says leaders have to model and be held accountable for their behaviours if you want culture change. Because Mats doesn’t show up to lead the organisation, the C-levels have free reign to act as they wish, desperately hiding their incompetence with cronyism (Advocacy), relentlessly putting profit before their people (Ltd and Marketing). HR is simply rotten to the core. Issues that were awful enough pre-COVID have become tenfold worse with the mass redundancies enacted during COVID. If staff felt that they were cared for and treated fairly before and during the redundancies, these layoffs would be sorrowful but not traumatic. However they have been so poorly handled that trust, engagement and performance within the organisation for those who survived is at all time low. This is unsurprisingly given that traits such as transparency, fairness, courage and empathy have not been practiced in the years prior. Everything you’ve read in other posts here about cronyism/nepotism, incompetence, disparity in salaries, undeserved promotion/overlooked promotion, etc is true. If you’re considering a job here – don’t. Don’t make a global pandemic worse by actively self-harming yourself joining this sh*t show. I know many current employees read the reviews here too (isn’t that a worrying sign?!) – update your CVs and make exit plans, you wouldn’t believe how much better it is out in the real world. Don’t martyr yourself for the purpose. Don’t let fear of the unknown keep you locked in this toxic environment.

avatar
GSMA Response
5y
Thank you for your feedback. The GSMA has undoubtedly been through one of the most difficult years in its history and our leadership team have had to make tough decisions. Leading during unprecedented times is a significant challenge and our leaders try to balance an open environment while safeguarding the GSMA’s reputation. If you’re willing to share specific points of improvement that you think will help us toward a culture consistent with our values, we’d appreciate hearing more. Our leadership team have always been open to feedback and would welcome a conversation to address your concerns.
1.0
29 Apr 2020

Sinking Ship

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work environment, international/global business, international travel and at one time the business was brimming with collaboration and teamwork.

Cons

GSMA is a fascinating example of complacency and empty leadership bringing a company to its knees. Numerous reviews on Glassdoor fault the DG for this failure but there is plenty of blame to spread around. Mats and his cabinet should be held accountable for the primary revenue generating portion of the business being run into the ground, but accountability is a foreign concept in GSMA’s culture. While GSMA promotes the idea of making the world a better place through mobile technology, their actions depict a mindset that lacks the slightest hint of focus. Personal agendas are in control and have evolved a previously collaborative and nurturing set of offices into a toxic work environment that is choking out all talent. There are no processes to follow at any level of the business. The loudest voices in the room dictate the course of a global business, without review or consequence. GSMA is an association first and foremost. The tricky caveat to this business is that the primary revenue generator is not membership to the association but the global events portfolio, led by MWC Barcelona. Association led events are historically unsuccessful for an extended period of time. GSMA hit a slow-to-manifest lottery with their Barcelona event and had a long runway to dig into what made it so special before falling victim to what drives most events to fail… poor planning and lack of value. Unfortunately, unchecked belief within the walls of GSMA that simply hosting an event with the GSMA name on it will guarantee success has prevented any thought or investigation into WHY the Barcelona event was successful. Over time, a company-wide hubris developed around their ability to host, manage and nurture events. If you don’t understand why your business succeeds, it’s going to be a real bear to comprehend the triggers that could lead to failure in the future. The reality is that an immense amount of luck slash being in the right place at the right time created a perfect and highly lucrative scenario in Barcelona. For a modern business professional witnessing the business planning process for events, the experience would be a mix of humor and brain-melting pain. Forecasting is a foreign concept. Revenue & attendance goals are generated on a whim by the CEO and GM. Numbers are plucked out of the air and strategy is led by gut instinct rather than evidence-based reasoning. Data that doesn’t align with the GM’s gut feeling is questioned ad infinitum or flatly dismissed. Budgets are routinely slashed in the middle of event cycles to meet margin targets. Goals that have direct correlation to these budgets are held to original targets and become impossible to meet. When those goals are not met, the response from senior leadership is to express disappointment and cite a lack of effort while refusing to address the overarching issues related to an invisible forecast, instability within budgeting exercises and pet projects eating up opportunities to deliver captivating and memorable events across the globe. The CEO has two faces. Public facing is a carefree guy who plays up the “I’m not the smartest guy in the room” act. But folly is the cloak of knavery and when it counts, his actions lack logic, double-cross his own teams and undermine the strategy of an entire business. Last fall a new CMO was brought on board. They’ve given themselves a 5 star rating on their April 8 Glassdoor post. At an individual level, this role at GSMA is a fascinating study in the damage that crushing personal insecurities can have on valuable character traits such as empathetic leadership, introspection and pragmatism. The CMO role is brimming with buzzwords and self-promotion but lacks substance and character. A startling contrast to the GSMA Values that are painted on office walls and referenced at every turn by the DG. GSMA is a global business with offices on 5 continents but is plagued by systemic HR issues. There is no process to recruitment which can be maddening. As a hiring manager, I was once excluded from the delivery and acceptance of an offer to a candidate. The compensation package, start-date and all associated negotiations were conducted by an internal recruiter without my knowledge or direction. More concerning is HR’s aversion to proactively dealing with workplace harassment. As an example, an individual in Atlanta had no fewer than 5 complaints raised against them in 2019 for harassment and badgering. This person was PROMOTED to a senior role in 2020. When employee surveys show poor morale and a lack of trust in leadership, the response from leadership is to point blame at the offices with the lowest scores. On a company-wide conference call in 2019, the DG stood in front of the London office and responded to a question about low company morale by saying, “if you don’t like how things are here, leave”. Amazing. Leaders create culture. Culture drives behavior. Behavior drives results. GSMA lacks C-suite leaders who comprehend the complexity of managing a global business. In a data-driven world, they’re light-years behind the businesses and organizations they claim to be assisting. As the lack of modern business acumen catches up with them, the house of cards will come crashing down.

avatar
GSMA Response
5y
Thank you for your review – we appreciate your honest feedback. We’re sorry to hear that you feel the company has changed and that the leadership team is not delivering. We have discussed your concerns with the Leadership Team. We’d love to take the opportunity to explain to you in greater detail the positive steps that we’re taking as an organisation and to understand in more detail your views. Please contact us on hrbp@gsma.com.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 346 Reviews

Glassdoor has 449 GSMA reviews submitted anonymously by GSMA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GSMA is right for you.