employer cover photo

Michigan Senate

Is this your company?

Michigan Senate Reviews

4.0

83% would recommend to a friend

(24 total reviews)

John D. Cherry Jr.

63% approve of CEO

46% positive business outlook

Michigan Senate has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 24 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Michigan Senate employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

24 reviews
5.0
30 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Self-managed schedule Diverse experiences Engaging Great colleagues Good HR

Cons

Drive time Can be tense Long hours Limited pay range Dependent on elections

2.0
1 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I had an incredible experience on the Comms Team on Dem Central Staff. My team members truly became a family, and I remain connected to team members past and present — relationships that will last a lifetime. Words cannot describe how much I learned in the Senate, how much of an impact I felt I made, and how much I enjoyed (most) of my time there.

Cons

I'm leaving this review to warn potential new employees of troubling dynamics within Dem Central Staff (which serves the whole Democratic Caucus rather than in any specific Senator's office), and in particular, the Comms Team, which may make them reconsider accepting a role there at this time. In the first 12 months of the Democratic majority, two highly talented comms / digital directors were forced out and two new ones (AR and MH) brought in. Out of an 11ish-person team, 9 people left (not including the 2 others who were forced out) as a direct result of their lack of management skills, dismissal of staff input and disrespect for us as professionals in their fields. Staff discovered that the two leaders were lying to us / telling different staff members different things, dragging their feet and then begrudgingly promising raises that they did not actually have the authority to grant, and insulting team members behind their backs. ("I'm sorry that I have to pair you with so-so" and "Senator X said they didn't think so-and-so is cut out for this job.") Much of their behavior seemed to stem from imposter syndrome — specifically, them feeling pressure from senior leadership and unhappy Senators, and deciding to demand last-minute deliverables from staff that had little value to the caucus, as if meant to distract Senators with "see, look at all the work we're doing for you!," even though Senators never asked for it. The two who were brought in were also very sensitive to what they seemed to feel were threats to their authority, and did not take well to help or constructive feedback from team members in any way. Several staff observed that they treated women on the team differently and more harshly / were more combative and occasionally engaged in microaggressions toward staff of color on Central Staff. Although one of the two who were brought in to lead the team (MH) was let go in Jan 2024, the other (AR) remains as the director. His leadership and social skills are underdeveloped (which he regularly admitted to), and would be better suited as a senior writer rather than a director of a whole team. Rather than managing the team, he spends much of his time closed up in his office writing press releases and speeches for the leader. A number of staff observed that he would intentionally take the long way walking to the bathroom, as if to avoid passing staff and have to interact with them. I share this not to rag on the poor guy — he is otherwise friendly and means no harm — but to illustrate the dysfunction of team leadership at this time. But the dysfunction unfortunately continues higher up. The current Chief of Staff for Central Staff, KOF (who is AR's supervisor), is very distant and uncommunicative with everyone but senior staff. KOF's team often withholds information that is vital for staff in the Comms Team and beyond to do their jobs. Her Deputy Chief of Staff, NG, operates similarly. Both have enabled the poor leadership on the Comms Team, including giving their blessing for MH and AR fire a longtime, highly-respected employee who tried advocating for raises for the more junior team members and regularly tried having one-on-one conversations with MH and AR in an effort to help them ease into their new jobs and manage the team.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 24 Reviews

Glassdoor has 31 Michigan Senate reviews submitted anonymously by Michigan Senate employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Michigan Senate is right for you.