employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Muscular Dystrophy Association

Is this your company?

Muscular Dystrophy Association Reviews

2.8

37% would recommend to a friend

(652 total reviews)

Sharon Hesterlee

100% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Muscular Dystrophy Association has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 652 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Muscular Dystrophy Association employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

652 reviews
5.0
6 Mar 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission driven, lots of flexibility and great relationships. The families and sponsors are amazing. The company continues to make changes that are beneficial to its employees.

Cons

National employees don't always have a good sense of what it's like in the field. Sometimes the cart is ahead of the horse.

avatar
Muscular Dystrophy Association Response
9y
Thank you for your review! We appreciate your feedback and support. We are continuing to move forward with implementing new and improved initiatives to benefit MDA employees. We understand your frustration of national staff not always fully understanding the important work the field does on a daily/hourly basis but are hopeful that this disconnect will continue to improve. If you have suggestions or concerns please reach out to your divisional HR Generalist, or use the anonymous suggestion box on Merlin. Thank you for all of the hard work you do!
2.0
5 Jul 2020

MDA Could Be Great with the Right Leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Working with families, volunteers, sponsors and colleagues -Office comraderie with co-workers -Generous time off policy, including PTO, holidays and special summer hours -Financial contribution to help fund HSAs for staff -403B match -Implementation of performance-based raises in the last two years -Spot cash rewards for staff (nominated by direct supervisor) for a job well done -Greater focus on research

Cons

-There is a clear and disturbing disconnect between the CEO, Lynn O'Connor Vos, and senior leadership with the field team. This has caused a severe deficiency in morale. -Restructuring, while necessary to remain relevant and competitive, occurs with what appears to be very little thought to implementation. There is a "let's figure it out later" mentality. This leads to a constant state of turmoil. -Inconsistent internal promotion practices. Senior leadership plays favorites and this appears to go unchecked by the Board of Directors and HR. Oftentimes, positions are filled that weren't announced which unfortunately excludes the ability for someone more qualified to apply. Optics are everything. -Dwindling direct services for families. MDA has gone from a robust provider of a vast menu of services to only summer camp and educational events, which are expensive to produce and aren't well-attended (educational events). -Little innovation in fundrasing programs. From what I can see, not a lot of cultivation of big donors locally or peer-to-peer fundraising outside of Muscle Walk and other events. -Perception of disorganization from healthcare partners -Mismanagement of finances. MDA has operated in the red for several years and it is shocking that they are still able to garner grants in spite of this. -Little staff participation in employee giving program. If your own people won't invest in you, why should anyone else. -While the MDA staff can't be privy to every decision made before it is announced, there is a spirit of secrecy and lack of transparency. -Staff has to stay at the ready because you never know when another reorganization is coming and when your position will be eliminated. It's very stressful. -Lack of SOPs (standard operating procedures) on the Innovations in Care (healthcare) side of the business. True data extraction is always iffy because of this. -Monthly programmatic financial reports have become obsolete so staff has no idea what the status of their budgets are -Lack of trickle-down communication between the Innovations in Care and fundraising teams unless you are fortunate enough to work in a highly functional office where teamwork between departments is a priority

avatar
Muscular Dystrophy Association Response
5y
Thank you for your transparent review and recommendations. We are sorry to hear about your discontent with leadership and operations, and we welcome you to contact HR directly to elaborate on ways we can improve. We appreciate your dedication to our organization - thank you for being part of the MDA family.
1.0
18 Dec 2015

If you just read one review, this is the one

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is really only one positive aspect, and it sets MDA apart from other non-profits: the amazing families you get to meet and work with on a regular basis. It is one of the only nonprofit organizations that has direct interaction with the families it serves, so it truly allows you to feel immersed in the mission and culture of helping others. It is the driving force behind everyone who has stayed for as long as they have; it is the one thing you find you miss when you are no longer there. Hand in hand with this aspect are the clinics that MDA is a part of. Every clinic I was able to go to observe seemed like the staff were just amazing to work with and was of great benefit to the families.

Cons

Let me preface by saying I have absolutely no animosity towards the organization. My review is simply stating facts while I worked there. How it impacts your decision, is solely up to you. Having worked my way up for many years, I must admit that the cons far outweigh the pros. 1. Your hours are long and uncompensated. You have dozens of events you manage each year; you are classified as exempt in any position that requires regular "after hours work" (even if it doesn't meet the State Labor Board's exempt classification requirements for your state). Your workload, in any given week, far exceeds your work hours (again, why you are classified as exempt). Your compensation is sub-par (it only takes a little research to figure this out), merit raises are non-existent (maybe after years of asking or advising you have another offer and they don't want to lose you), and performance evals don't even assist in helping you with better compensation or raises (they are rarely even completed according to the own HR timeline). 2. While a small handful of upper management who are still there are actually great leaders and managers, the vast majority are not. If you have any issues related to your direct management, best of luck. You will be expected to manage your managers. HR is of no help at all either; I'm not even sure why they have this department. It would seem as though no one in upper management wants to take ownership of management they've hired that have become a problem. It may directly relate to no one in HR to doing anything other than to let the people who are the problem know about it without addressing how it will be fixed. 3. What vacation you do receive, has restrictions on when you can use it. Management can and does expect (at times) that you put the needs of the organization before your own personal trips, birthdays, anniversaries, events, etc. As such, "being flexible" is a job requirement and occasional nights and weekends means "many." 4. Despite all this, if the mission is strong enough to keep you there for several years, your retirement options are non-existent. You might as well pay into your own private plan. For years they didn't offer anything, and then they offered a plan where there is no company match: not even 1%. (This might be a little different now for upper management). Although, depending on your compensation level, investing in any plan could prove to be problematic (unless you are upper management). 5. The majority of money raised is at the local level: that means it's all on your tiny office to make this happen. For many years, despite economic downturns, almost every local budget was raised. It clearly demonstrated that management was focused on only one thing. Not just sustaining company funding, but fighting harder for every dollar to be had. Need I say where the majority of this extra money is raised? 6. While there are career opportunities, as people often quit or are let go, there is no rhyme or reason as to how you can get promoted. Some people are offered the job internally, while some have to apply like everyone else. Others are encouraged to strive for more and work harder when the position is filled, but then told they don't see them as a good fit once the position is open. Some people who get promoted are the ones that do the least amount to contribute to their team; most that end up leaving are some of the best the company has ever had. 7. My last point is truly the most disappointing of them all. While the company says it is there to serve the families, it doesn't want to acknowledge problems that the families bring to their attention. When families start to notice that things are slipping, there are clinic issues, MDA staff are overworked and treated poorly, or their local management behaves or speaks unprofessionally towards them: this should be addressed expeditiously and provide some sort of resolution without being deflected. Instead, in my time there, I have seen letters be dismissed without responses and phone calls not returned (that truly warrant follow up). Families were left feeling that as long as they are helping at events, nothing else really matters.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 652 Reviews

Glassdoor has 688 Muscular Dystrophy Association reviews submitted anonymously by Muscular Dystrophy Association employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Muscular Dystrophy Association is right for you.