employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Network Architects

Is this your company?

Network Architects Reviews

2.6

35% would recommend to a friend

(20 total reviews)

41% positive business outlook

Network Architects has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 20 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Network Architects employee rating is 32% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

20 reviews
1.0
21 May 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None. The only pro is that you get a paycheck...even though it is well below market rate. Not worth your time. Dont get me started on how racist, toxic, and sexist the workplace environment is. If you are a woman in the workplace in Network Architects, I can tell you: dont work here...they get treated so horribly just for being women. Lots of racism too, Brian McKinley (CEO) loves to tell you how wrong you are if you aren't all in for the MAGA kool aid.

Cons

The CEO is really racist and sexist, and knows absolutely nothing about tech. He cant even order hardware without screwing it up. Imagine Jeff Bezos with a MAGA hat who routinely spews toxic words out of his suck hole. He drives his Escalade pretending to be a big man and compensates accordingly. The CTO is just collecting a check and astroturfing glassdoor reviews. You can see from his own lengthy review that he is trying to cover up for the hellish environment full of toxic white masculinity.

avatar
Network Architects Response
6y
On behalf of everyone here at Network Architects thank you for submitting your thoughts on your period of employment with us. We would like to state that all our employees are provided an employee manual which outlines our expectations of our employees, one of those expectations is to show up to work on time. Our management staff also has a very open door policy in that any of your concerns you had the opportunity to discuss prior to your departure of employment. We are sorry if you had a bad experience during your employment however like any opportunity for some it is what you make of it. We can only assume that since your posting a negative review your time with us was unsatisfactory or you were terminated from employment. Its understandable that when released from employment the first response is that of anger, over time you will learn from your mistakes and grow in your new employment and career path. While its easy for the unemployed to take shots at their employer, we are not allowed the same opportunity in stating the reasons for terminated employment. We wish all our employees past, present, and future the best in their career path.
1.0
19 Feb 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Clients are genuinely nice to work with and understanding. • Many of the employees have a great understanding of their respected fields and are very helpful. • Occasional free lunches and free snacks • Further learning for IT careers. NA has systems in place for employees to continue their IT education with Certifications. A great incentive to continue your education well past formal schooling. • New client signup bonus. This is a rare occurrence but if happens it is very nice. • The paycheck • Free parking*

Cons

• Blatant favoritism. If something is done wrong by one employee, it could get them in trouble. However, if that same thing is done by another employee, they may get a slap on the wrist. If you are not liked, expect to be the fall man. • Bigoted and inappropriate topics discussed openly with employees. I sat in many meetings where the CEO acted inappropriately and spoke about topics that should otherwise be left out of the workplace. Topics in these meetings vary from harmless football discussion to racist, sexist, or anti-LGBT discussion. Many of these topics should NEVER be talked about in a workplace. Especially by the CEO to his employees. • Stressful Work Environment. If the CEO is having a bad day, you will likely have a bad day as well. If he is having a good day, your day may be filled with laughs, constant distractions, and a free hotdog lunch. The good days are okay, and the bad days are very bad. • CEO Pet peeves. The CEO has many pet peeves that are “unofficial rules” at the company. These range from simple small things to things that will affect your day to day work. • Glassdoor reviews. The CFO and CEO scan Glassdoor for bad reviews from previous employees and respond to them. Once these reviews come in, that pervious employee’s perception changes quickly internally. An employee who leaves could have been “a stand-up guy” one day. But the day they put in a bad review, they were “lazy” or “never a good worker”. At my time at NA I never openly spoke about how I felt about this, but this always seemed unprofessional to me. • Little to No overtime compensation. Expect no OT pay or Comp. Time for working jobs after 5pm. When I questioned about Comp. Time or OT pay, I was told there were no official rules on OT or comp time. Expect to be a “team player” and work longer hours for no compensation whatsoever. • Strict arrival. Arrival time is 8am, however there is an unspoken rule to arrive at least 15 minutes early. If you come in any second later than 7:45am you are late. I am not exaggerating when I say, a second later than 7:45am and you are late. Depending on the day, the CEO may even be waiting by the front door for you and will comment about your late arrival. • Strict departure. If you leave a minute early at 4:59pm you are deemed a slacker and should expect to get spoken to about your tardiness. Even though the unofficial start time is 7:45am you are expected to leave no later than 5pm every day regardless of what time you came in the morning. Do not expect your schedule to be altered in any way to reflect the 7:45 start time. Be wary of testing this as well. The CEO might be hiding in the parking lot waiting for you to leave early. • No remote options. The type of work done here begs to be done remotely with all the tools given to the employees. Unless you are a favorite, do not expect to have the opportunity to work remotely. • Parking. There are parking spots reserved for NA employees, however if you take any of these spots in the morning, expect to be spoken to about it by the CFO or the CEO. You are ONLY allowed to park in one of these spots IF you have checked the rest of the lot for a free parking space. This rule applies to everyone except the CEO. • No positive reinforcement from management. You will be berated for small mistakes and will never be rewarded for going above and beyond. Expect a big red mark on your employee record for every mistake and not even a pat on the back for doing something well. • Micromanagement. Do not expect any mistake to go unnoticed here. If you are a salary employee, don’t expect to have the freedom that comes with it. Your time is recorded in tickets the second you step into the front door to the moment you leave. Every ticket will be picked apart for quality. If there is a gap in your ticket time, expect to be spoken to about it. • Sink or Swim Training. The training can be a hit or a miss depending on the workload of the other employees who need to train new employees. If things are slow, expect a thorough training. If things are busy, expect to have a day at most to learn everything, then get thrown into the ticket que. • “Game day.” In my time at NA, game day was a day where we were supposed to relax and do fun things like games. This day never came and as such will remain on the cons list.

avatar
Network Architects Response
6y
In response to this writeup lets refer to this employee as simply M. I need to start out by informing you that this employee is no longer with our company, there is a reason they are not with our company as if they were worth keeping we certainly would have. This employee had a resume stating their IT skills were strong when in reality they are not, in addition the employee actively markets themselves as an engineer without having any experience or education in this area. The reality here is that this employee said they could do the job when in reality they truly are a beginner trying to do a job for which they did not have the skills needed. As to the rest of their issues I will elaborate on that so readers may understand the other side. The first comment of favoritism or a bias towards or against any group of people is just wrong! Network Architects actively employees people of all color, race, religion, and sexual orientation. It is our feeling that since this employee came from an area that did not embrace this acceptance that is the root cause of their complaints. We also do not censor ones freedom of speech so if you have something to say or discuss openly we encourage that, rather than make an employee keep anything positive or negative inside. Network Architects does operate on a support schedule which is explained in the employee manual, interview process, and before an employee ever accepts a position with us. Its no secret we hit the ground running at 8am for our clients, we do ask employees to be prepared for the day by 7:45am not sure why this is an issue of asking employees to be ready to work, that is why we are all here:) If an employee is late of course that is an issue, our clients need our support so if you were not planning on working please refrain from applying. All employees here are salary, I dont think this employee understands what exactly that means as we dont have overtime...we are all salary. Again this just goes to show the lack of professional experience in the work place to understand working in a corporate environment. Our employees do not work remotely as often we are required to visit a client site, or if an emergency should occur we need the flexibility to go onsite quickly. Again this employee lacked the understanding of what it is we do on the most rudimentary level so their understanding of how support and IT operations are done was simply incorrect. This employee struggled to show up on time for our morning meetings where we discuss this and how we support clients in a variety of ways. If the employee wanted to work and showed up on time, lots of attendance issues here, then they would have had better results in their career here. We also need to trust that an employee can do the job before ever considering remote work, if this employee cant even understand being on time and being prepared, along with having a solid set of IT skills it would be different. We provide free parking for all employees, not sure what the complaint is here. We do have guest spots for visitors so employees can use either, pretty simple to understand except for this employee. This employee M. had a very minor set of IT skills so they were routinely confused as to resolving basic troubleshooting, thus this reflected on the type of management that was needed. They have taken our additional steps of teaching and guiding and turned it into some sort of negative micromanagement. This again goes back to their lack of education and skills being the root issue. My favorite comment is 'game day', we occasionally have a game day where we do team building games in the office. This employee was here such a short period of time they did not get to partake in that. We enjoy an employees right to voice their concerns, its too bad that this employee neglected to do any of those steps during their short term with us. The sad reality is that this platform allows a poor employee a voice to post negative comments about an employer rather than sharing the truth and reality. This employee simply did not have the skills to remain employed here, misrepresented themselves on paper and to this day publicly. My advice to them would be to take some time to self reflect on understanding what it means to work in a corporate environment, understanding punctuality, understanding how to work with diverse people, and lastly work on your IT skills as they are a much needed area of improvement.
1.0
2 Jun 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Availability to work with multiple clients sites. This isn’t necessarily a pro with network architects but working with an MSP. Free catered lunch on occasions.

Cons

Everything here is a con starting the minute you interview to your first day here. There are so many cons to list here but will start with the biggest cons. Management: Management here is plagued with unpleasant, unprofessionalism that starts with the owner. He is very verbally abusive towards his support staff that he will go off on random rants, and topics that are not exaggerated in previous reviews by any means. He’ll yell at the team as a whole, and make excuses for his own failures, and inability to run a successful IT company. He lacks a general understanding of IT but yet doesn’t trust his support staff unless you’re a rare favorite of his or a brown-noser like some were while I was there. He has pet peeves that range from minor things such as one of his TVs turning off which he’ll ask where his TV display is, and why it’s off. Oh by the way he has this perception that clients will walk into his office and see stats or ticket closure rates on his TVs and think they would care, but with his lack of understanding he doesn’t realize most clients could care less and often wouldn’t understand what they were reading, but it just shows his stupidity. He will also randomly just come out to the main floor and start talking loudly, and for his clients to hear without checking if someone else is on the phone. It’s no wonder he cannot keep clients because he proves his unprofessionalism everyday to clients. He also doesn’t deliver world class IT services. I could name 3-4 other MSPs that do but he doesn’t compare. The CTO is not far off from the absolute worse technology manager I have ever witnessed in IT he too lacks so many IT skills and really is just at network architects to be the owner’s personal own hand puppet. The CTO will conduct his morning meeting, and go off an agenda of all criticisms towards support staff some of it is fueled by the owner from previous comments from the day before but either way he is not looking to praise any support staff. Usually someone’s name will come up “unless you’re a favorite” and your name will come up for your lack of attention to a support ticket or a minor mistake you made which he will turn it around that the employee is not a skilled IT professional or was too lazy to work. Just look at his own childish responses to other negative reviews this is the person you’ll have right deal with on a regular basis. Polices: The biggest pet peeve they have is on time polices the management will fully disclose your start and end times, but have an unwritten rule that if you’re not at your desk by 7:45am you’re considered late instead if you show up at 7:54am, 7:59am or 8:01am your name WILL be brought up in the morning meeting or you’ll get a red mark on your employee file. If you’re not a favorite expect your job here to last 3-6 months on average. Also don’t expect management to overlook if you leave right at 5pm unless both managers are already gone for the day. If they catch you leaving at your end time at 5pm you’ll most likely get reprimanded the next day. There excuses will be that you didn’t complete your work for the day. Other things to consider if you decide to work for Network Architects. You will have to count for every minute of work on your time sheet as if you’re an hourly employee that means if by the end of the week you put in 39.50 hours you will get a e-mail from the CTO explaining your lack of hours. Seems to me that they’re the ones that do not understand hourly vs salary employees. It will be rather difficult to account for every minute because they’re really not busy with tickets they will just waste your time. I highly encourage people to consider not working here, and look elsewhere your day will be miserable on your first day.

avatar
Network Architects Response
5y
I am pleased to be able to respond to this review as the employee who wrote this is obviously not with our organization. Over the last year or so we have gone through every employee and weeded out the bad apples and as such they chose to wright negative reviews. I certainly do not appreciate the words written as almost every word written is factually incorrect however Glassdoor does not provide a platform for proving ones case. We also are aware that the negative comments provided by others were part of a larger group of disgruntled employees all of which were terminated. The individual who wrote this is one of the poorest performing individuals we have ever had employed here. They were consistently late, gave medical excuses which did not exist, and have no business working in IT at all. This employee was lazy, unprofessional, unable to work with others and harassed other individuals in the company unless they got their way. This employee was written up for code and ethics violations more than any other employee in history. I should also note that this employee gave out confidential information to clients and friends in an attempt to make themselves look better. This employee also used company equipment to search for new jobs, houses, chat, play games, watch movies, and tried to hide it. If that wasnt bad enough they tried to cover up their own IT mistakes by saying it was work done by other employees. It honestly hurts my heart a bit to have read this as we gave this employee additional income to get through some tough times, free IT equipment to better themselves, and all the training that they asked for. In return they were not happy as a person and blamed others for their own unhappy life. The only positive note here is that as an organization we have learned from this experience and hire only well qualified professionals.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 20 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21 Network Architects reviews submitted anonymously by Network Architects employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Network Architects is right for you.