Padlet Reviews

4.4

90% would recommend to a friend

(26 total reviews)

Nitesh Goel

90% approve of CEO

90% positive business outlook

Padlet has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 26 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Padlet employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

26 reviews
1.0
18 Jul 2024

not sure

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I like to work in companies not doing well so I can be a hero

Cons

There are regular firings and managers do not know what they are doing so every day is quite exciting cause you dont know what to expect, it is possible that it is too exciting for some and they cannot take it

5.0
28 May 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has a strong engineering culture where learning through collaboration and mentorship is an organisational priority. When I first joined Padlet, I was assigned a senior engineer as an onboarding buddy for my first 30 days. During that time, he prioritised making my onboarding experience as comfortable as possible, while also making me feel welcomed. I also receive weekly 1-1s with my manager, the country head of Singapore, where he provides not just guidance and support, but also actively seeks to unblock issues I face in the course of my work. The company is also lead by technical leaders - the CEO, head of growth and country head are not just competent in running the company, but also excellent engineers I can go to for technical advice. My coworkers are smart and dependable, and I learn a lot from them on a daily basis, through discussions, code reviews and chit-chats at the pantry. They are also really nice and supportive.

Cons

This is a very lean organisation - even though the company's product, Padlet, has over 40 million active monthly users, there are less than 50 employees, of which fewer than 30 are engineers. You would have to wear many hats, and work independently through ambiguity on a daily basis. This environment provides you with the freedom to make decisions (and mistakes with a no-blame culture), and also countless opportunities to do many different things. This is not really a con but more of a challenge, which may not suit you if you prefer a more structured and segmented position.

5.0
6 Jul 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* I feel like the company has tried to provide everything one needs to do our best work, e.g. top-of-the-line hardware that we have opportunities to refresh. We don't have to think about spending time queueing up for lunch in the business district because the company allows us to order in and pays for it. * We offer the best health insurance for companies of its size (with only 20+ people in Singapore). * It's a collaborative environment while also allowing for blocks of time for quiet work; it's something engineers will appreciate. Also, some of the best engineers I've ever worked with. It's quite a fun bunch. * The company is very averse to meetings; we, including management, avoid them whenever possible. We encourage other means of syncing up. * A fierce drive to improve/extend the product to make it more useful, while retaining as much simplicity as possible. We say "no" to a lot of things we can do because of our focus and a recognition of how we want to best use our resources. * A lot of knowledge about how the product is built is documented and/or is in the process of being documented. The documentation is open to read. Engineers can read about decisions someone has made even though it's outside of the scope of their team. * At the time of writing, we operate on their own revenue. We worry less about job security due to a short runway provided solely by investors. * Managers (can) also contribute as individual contributors, albeit much less. We have a direct line to our managers. * Management focuses a lot on continuous improvement of the status quo, be it in terms of productivity or in terms of policy. We are often asked about how we can improve the way we work. * We are allowed some time to pay down some of the tech debt we incur. We can request more time depending on the scale/scope of the debt vs business concerns. * As an engineer, we can request and do have access to some great tools (with some constraints, e.g. how secure/compliant they are). * We use mostly mature technologies, so we're building on stable, well-understood technologies. We pick tools that are proven to work or experiment extensively to ensure that they do. We don't have to keep looking over our shoulder once they are in production.

Cons

* The company relies a lot on folks being self-starters/self-managers. We have a lot of opportunity to craft our own role and identify areas in which we want to and can contribute. It's inherent to the size of the company and how fast it wants to move. This might not work for everyone. * There's a lot of institutional knowledge to acquire. Mastery of the company's domain definitely takes a while, but the information is there either via the internal Stack Overflow or through conversations with seniors. It can be quite a learning journey. * The Singapore office is in a shophouse: a heritage building. While cool, the age does show in ways, e.g. with leaks.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 26 Reviews

Glassdoor has 27 Padlet reviews submitted anonymously by Padlet employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Padlet is right for you.