Sol Systems Reviews

3.0

32% would recommend to a friend

(42 total reviews)

Yuri Horwitz

29% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

Sol Systems has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 42 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Sol Systems employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Energy, mining, utilities industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

42 reviews
1.0
17 Jun 2018

Revolving Door

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Beware of the positive reviews posted at the same time. They create fake email accounts to boost their ratings and counter the negative reviews. Let's see, something positive? Location is right above the metro and there's lots of places to eat. They have a Wellness room where you can find all kinds of fun things like condom wrappers and yoga mats.

Cons

This place is a lot like the White House a few blocks away: from the revolving door to fake news to bafoons in leadership roles. If you're interviewing here, ask them how many people have exited over the past 12 months. If they say any number under 30, they're lying. Also, ask them about the exit survey results. They won't tell you, but you should still ask. There was a mass exodus when all of the smart and competent people either got fired for being smart and competent and calling them on their unfair, racist, sexist practices, or willingly quit when they realized that they were surrounded by the most arrogant and idiotic leadership team imaginable. It's not a coincidence that 98% of the people who left were minorities. It's also not a coincidence that there are only 3 people of color in the entire organization. Don't believe me? Take a look at the staff photos. Where do I start with the incompetent leaders? They'll tell you until they are blue in the face that they are "kind and humble," except they're not. Look around and there are a handful of law school rejects who have gotten ahead because of who they know, not what they know. The CEO has surrounded himself with yes-people/echo chambers to feed his fragile ego. The fact that so many people have left this place is a direct correlation to the awful culture and the person who was put in charge of it because she's friends with the right people but has no brain cells or actual experience doing much like managing, leading, thinking.

1.0
24 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked here for most of 3 years part-time; full-time as both a consultant and employee (at the time this company was a startup so this was typical...). I poured my heart and soul into this company, skipping a final semester of college and working nights and weekends to help them successfully save a dying business segment. Within six months of working here I had sourced and diligenced multiple profitable ideas and was the most tenured member of that department. Subsequently, I onboarded every current senior member of that team. I often slept at the office or pulled all-nighters, some weeks averaging 3 hours of sleep per night. During my tenure I worked on projects with/for every business segment including the executive team and board of directors and knew everyone in the company by name. Overall, that is a very unique opportunity and I was lucky to experience it. I really didn't want to leave, but when I was pushed out was ultimately replaced by at least three full-time employees. Most of my fellow operatives were genuinely driven, motivated, and passionate about their work, as were some middle managers and one c-suite executive. Most people are great to have a drink with after work. Nothing personal in this review against those folks. Since the default expectation is that you will be a mindless drone it is very easy to perform well if you can apply any measure of critical thinking to your drone duties. If you are willing/able to deal with excessive incompetence, there's always Hanlon's razor ("Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"). I don't think anyone here actually wanted to be mean to me, but apparently if you give stupid people control over your time and energy it will feel roughly the same in practice. The business segments each has its own character, highly driven by the director, so if you find a good team fit it could work out well. Maybe they've changed?

Cons

This is not a mission driven company. Management simply uses that mantra to pay below-market for labor (which they do aggressively). I made barely a living wage for most of my time working here, and for a period lived out of my car. Worse than that, they took every opportunity to short my compensation, including failing to pay even close to my full bonus multiple years in a row (this is financial services so bonuses are part of the expected deal to make things workable) and withdrawing directly from my bank account after they pushed me out. I left this place financially broke, burnt out, and disenchanted with humanity's chances of actually doing the good work that needs doing. Most of the people I met and professionally respected here have either left or consider themselves stuck there because of their financial or professional development situation. I didn't meet many who were here because they thought they could make the largest impact by doing it. Sure, it's a job in the solar industry. Mission complete. Now I can go to happy hour and wait it out until people can call me "experienced." Otherwise it's the standard D.C. treadmill. There is no professional development function. To reply to this quote from another review: "People need to make their own opportunities. Nobody can plan your career for you." This is not a place where you can make your own opportunities and I did not meet anyone there who successfully "made their own opportunity." If you are in a good position to pick up an initiative that has already been thought up or proven by the executive team and really dig into it, you might get support. But there is no infrastructure for proposing ideas or aligning employee career paths with the organization's goals, and therefore trying to make your own opportunity just makes you a squeaky wheel likely to get negative attention. The beginning of the end was when I scheduled a meeting to discuss an "opportunity" with the CFO at the time and he told me that my job didn't involve thinking. The people who tried to convince me that self-directed professional development at Sol was possible ended up being the ones to throw me under the bus via a defamatory review during the coordinated effort to push me out the door. My best guess is that they perceived that my ideas overlapped with theirs in a way that made them feel threatened about their "opportunity", though as far as I saw we were never actually conflicted. This insecurity runs throughout the organization and is just as good a replacement for malice as anything. These people lasted less than a year at the company before also leaving (well into the reign of additional HR resources that were added more recently than I can attest to). The best case scenario for "making your own opportunity" here is that you would essentially do all of the work required to start a company on your own time and budget and then be paid a nice salary by Sol who obviously owns the end result and gets the upside. Oh, and it will take 2x as long, stress you out 10x as much, and be 1/4 as profitable as doing it on your own. People who are truly able to make their own opportunities are called "entrepreneurs" and they don't work here. The idea that you might have freedom one day is a constant-distance carrot that management deploys strategically to get you to do what they want. The least ambitious people on average are treated the best here. Though I enjoyed getting to know them as officemates and sometimes on projects, I did not get to work for any of the "genuinely driven, motivated, and passionate" people I mentioned above. Others spent most of their time reading Business Insider and negotiating their own compensation and remote work plan based on my performance while ignoring our scheduled meetings and email, and telling me to perform tasks so far outside the mission of the company and my job description that I literally thought they were joking (they was not). There was no avenue of recourse for this despite my clear and direct statements to multiple people with control over the situation, and eventually the constant distraction and interruption of these irrelevant "urgent" tasks overwhelmed my actual job duties. At best, the company lied about my job responsibilities and compensation to get me to transition from consulting to employment status. To be 100% clear, this is the reason I didn't fight to stay when I was being pushed out: the role I would have been fighting for had been destroyed by the very people who should have been the greatest champions of it. I accepted the loss because it was clear the company wasn't going to listen to my side. I did not meet anyone in the C-suite who had any concept of how to scale a business or run a one at scale. Basically, their strategy for growth is to run really fast in a circle and hope someone gives you a gold star or you pass out and achieve some level of euphoria from that before starting again (bonus points for hitting one's head against a wall somehow in the process). The amount of technical debt they manage to accrue via this method is really incredible and it's burned out many of their former employees. Subsequently, they have not really grown at all, despite a lot of talk about doing so and having given up massive amounts of equity for chances to scale which they failed to execute on. The incompetence with which my business segment was run was laughable. If you want to actually learn or do anything impactful there you'll be on your own and probably undermined by poor managerial abilities as well. And as I am acutely aware, even if you surmount all of these obstacles to perform well you will not be compensated appropriately. I was repeatedly asked to diligence deals that could only be executed by violating federal or state laws. These types of deals were recommended to our "investment committee" (CEO+CFO co-founders at the time) where they were taken seriously and at least once executed on at the direct expense of our clients. If you must work here, avoid the trading desk. I would not be surprised if it is shut down by the authorities or management in the near future...or if it blows up due to being poorly run. My understanding is that they have faced at least one margin call during the pandemic which prevented previously agreed-upon bonuses from being paid. For the record here is how my departure went down: - Try to make the "opportunity" path work, articulating a plan of action that management signs off on at the beginning of the year to do my job more efficiently so as to enable scaling without excessive overhead. I also discuss with HR (a C-level executive wearing multiple hats) in advance and receive approval to work on a set of projects outside of my current team's purview. - I execute the plan as planned for the first few months of the year. - This plan is ignored and inappropriate duties are added to my plate by lying about their priority from the C-suite (I deflected, communicated clearly that this was not okay, yet it did not cease) (This is when I should have left). - I report the specifics of the behavior to HR, who refer me to the CFO (one rung above me as far as I can tell from the non-existent org chart) - CFO and I decide on a transition which would involve me consulting while we figure out the opportunity proactively based on what I've done so far and keep it quiet since the drama aspect of multiple others' behavior is not ideal for anyone (and, per Hanlon's razor, may not be malicious). I submit my notice on his word that we will figure it out, and keep things quiet as agreed. - Secretly, there has been a search for a replacement the entire time, and one is hired at this point. - The CEO publicly announces to everyone that I've decided to leave (an outright lie) - I am asked to fill out an exit interview questionnaire - Sol drags their feet on consulting arrangement while I do work on a trust basis ("we are busy with this other deal"). - I get no bonus for the year, the reason is later stated as multiple different things including reviews I haven't seen yet (turns out to be a bogus frame-up), "other people need that money more than you" (what?), "ultimately bonuses are discretionary" (typical b.s.) - Stop-gap consulting agreement is signed (at this point I just want to be made partially whole and get out before truly getting hurt), I am paid for the time spent in transition. Company is supposed to scope out next steps during this time. - Company does not propose any new projects, or for my prior work to continue. - 2 more replacements are hired over the course of the next months.

1.0
31 Jan 2025

Beware

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly co-workers for the most part, free lunches in the office,

Cons

The company is 15 years old still can't decide what kind of company it wants to be. The CEO cycles through executive leadership unlike anything I've ever seen. In the last three years there has been no less than 8 or 9 people hired to executive level positions that have already left. The company has pursued multiple failed attempts to start new business areas and people are leaving the company faster than they can hire replacements. I would not recommend this company to anyone who takes their career seriously. You will cycle through many different managers, conflicting guidance as priorities change every couple of months, constant reorganizations of teams and departments. and a general level of disorganization and lack of self-awareness that you wouldn't find at a more serious company.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 42 Reviews

Glassdoor has 52 Sol Systems reviews submitted anonymously by Sol Systems employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Sol Systems is right for you.