TetraScience Reviews

3.9

68% would recommend to a friend

(50 total reviews)

Patrick Grady

68% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

TetraScience has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 50 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The TetraScience employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

50 reviews
1.0
1 May 2026

Toxic Leadership and Disrespectful Cultured

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting industry space for a start up

Cons

My experience with Tetrascience was one of the most negative I’ve had in my career. The core issue is leadership there is a clear lack of professionalism, emotional intelligence, and basic respect for employees. Certain managers communicate in ways that feel openly hostile, including raising their voices and creating an environment driven by fear rather than collaboration. The culture is deeply problematic. Employees are expected to deliver under constant pressure without support, recognition, or appropriate compensation. It often feels like leadership prioritizes control and output over people, which leads to burnout and disengagement. There is little to no effort to create a healthy or sustainable work environment. Compensation and benefits are also well below expectations. The absence of a 401(k) and meaningful bonus structure is a major red flag, especially given the demands placed on employees. The interview process reflects the same lack of respect. Candidates are required to go through long, tedious, multi-hour interviews, only to be ignored afterward with no follow-up or closure. It shows a disregard for candidates’ time and effort that mirrors how employees are treated internally. Overall, this is not an environment where people are set up to succeed. Without major changes in leadership behavior and company culture, it’s difficult to recommend working here. * Toxic leadership and poor communication * Disrespectful and high-pressure culture * Weak benefits (no 401k, no bonus) * Disorganized and inconsiderate interview process

1.0
3 Mar 2026

Potential wasted by leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Much needed product - Smart colleagues. Driven. - Good health insurance

Cons

Nothing is operationalized, and the leadership is consistently allergic to any attempts to operationalize things. So, nothing gets properly productized. Nothing is scalable. Every person must figure everything out on their own, rebuilding the wheel each time. Any attempt to fix this is seen as slowing things down. Leadership loves going fast, at the cost of any quality, scalability, repeatability.. anything. - Very high attrition. Salespeople are regularly fired within a quarter. No attempt made to actually improve things as leaders and ICs leave. Leadership favors new employees over seasoned ones: they absolutely do not value experience or relationships built. Everyone is seen as replaceable. - CEO boasts about having no onboarding and that micromanaging is necessary. New employees, beware: you’re expected to perform to perfection right away, and will be extensively micromanaged to that effect. There is literally no enablement, no role onboarding resources. Roles aren’t defined anyway- the entire backbone of the org chart is constantly in flux, so no one knows who to turn to for anything. - CEO is a narcissist. This isn’t hyperbole, it’s a frightening truth. He (and the CTO) created a culture of fear. People are yelled at for asking normal questions. You must obey, you cannot question. - CEO changes the strategic direction of the company quarterly, with no tactics whatsoever. And when things inevitably fail, he yells at the company in an all-hands for an hour, blaming everyone else. There’s no retrospective, no inward reflection, no improvements. The solution every time is to fire people, and hire someone new, rinse and repeat. - Account teams are very poorly resourced. Customers are repeatedly disappointed by our lackluster execution, and account teams are blamed, rather than the leaders not resourcing teams at all (people expected to fill 2-4 full-time roles). - Leadership consistently overpromises, then blames account teams for not delivering.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 50 Reviews

Glassdoor has 59 TetraScience reviews submitted anonymously by TetraScience employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if TetraScience is right for you.