TripleLift Reviews

2.3

27% would recommend to a friend

(210 total reviews)

Dave Helmreich

20% approve of CEO

20% positive business outlook

TripleLift has an employee rating of 2.3 out of 5 stars, based on 210 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The TripleLift employee rating is 40% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

210 reviews
3.0
15 Mar 2023

Colleagues are great

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fully remote which gives you the flexibility. It's a lean team so everyone gets along with one another.

Cons

No company focus on APAC. Products are not evolving based on market trends.

avatar
TripleLift Response
2y
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We continuously evaluate market trends and try to make adjustments to our product offerings. We appreciate your views about the APAC region specifically. Thank you for your insights on how we can improve.
1.0
2 May 2024

The Emperor Has No Clothes

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

+Some teams are compensated well. +/- There's some job flexibility (though that diminished after a RTO mandate for a few offices). + There are really cool and smart people still at TripleLift (for now).

Cons

What a dark road we've been on. What was once a vibrant, fairly happy company culture has so quickly tanked under the new leadership -- without revenue to show for it. The only profitability we can boast is that which came from cutting resources, leaving teams lean and over-worked without the tools and resources they need to be effective. Our execs' idea of culture seems to be bringing out pastries once a week, hugging the three people they like, and implying that if you’ve been at this company for over three years you simply miss the founders — therefore, any critique you have of their leadership must be firmly negated. While it’s true many of us miss having a CEO whose approval rating on Glassdoor had never fallen into the 20s, the reason isn’t just because our founder-CEO had a better personality and was more fun (true, but really not a requirement for company growth). It’s because our founders had created a culture where people generally liked to go to work and were allowed to share their opinions without fear of losing their jobs, and decisions were made that actually led to revenue growth and profitability. Call me crazy, but people like to be at companies where they feel appreciated and can actually see clear company growth, ensuring job stability and a future in what can be a sometimes rocky industry. This set of execs is bleeding talent, and that talent cared about the company and had deep institutional knowledge. That said, when people with institutional knowledge leave it chips further away at public memory, which is a boon to some of these execs who can now quite openly rewrite history and run from accountability. It’s a neat trick, but it’s not particularly sustainable for the business. A fairly unpopular return to office mandate has simply made it easier than ever for disgruntled employees to tell each other how deeply unhappy they are, and how often they're looking for new jobs. Of course, the execs seem to be happy or indifferent whenever people leave, but who will be left? Meanwhile, HR sugarcoats the results of our 48% engagement score. I know, HR is never a friend of the people, but HR isn't supposed to increase risk to company profitability either. What I mean by this is the engagement score showcases how deeply unhappy we are, and unhappy employees are not profitable employees, and perhaps HR should be working with the leadership on real solutions instead of just telling us on company-wide calls how not so bad it is. Any leader worth their salt would know to do that. TripleLift hired smart people, and smart people see what's going on, so let's not insult our intelligence further by trying to imply we simply don't understand what's happening to our company.

1.0
17 Apr 2024

Moving Backwards

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Unlimited PTO - Some very talented people - Depending on who you are or what's going on that week, pretty decent work/life balance.

Cons

It's been a distinct pleasure working alongside some of the best talent in the industry. Before the Vista acquisition, TripleLift stood as a unicorn company, charting the course for programmatic native advertising while collaborating with the largest advertisers and media companies across industries. We boasted incredible leadership and a culture that fostered lifelong friendships, and in some cases, even marriages. We outpaced our competition by carving out our own market, delivering differentiated value, and managing our commodity products more effectively and efficiently than other SSPs. Experiencing a banner year felt routine, and we all anticipated a strategic acquisition on the horizon. TripleLift was engineered for rapid scalability, and it delivered. It was an exhilarating time, but exiting at the peak of the Covid era M&A frenzy was a significant factor in our $1.4B acquisition by Vista Equity. Following the acquisition, employees were compensated for vested shares, with some receiving substantial payouts, while the vesting schedule for remaining shares was upheld, ensuring decent retention. However, the first notable setback was the lack of transparency or foresight regarding future equity. Some were offered obscure retention plans, featuring trivial payouts and a lofty 3X evaluation goal unlikely to be achieved in our lifetime. Flush with cash post-acquisition, we acquired 1plusX, a Swiss-based DMP. Although we eventually integrated their teams into ours, the legacy DMP product remains challenging to support and integrate into our programmatic offerings. Over time, nearly all of our C-suite departed, with some departing more swiftly than others, but none of the original founders or team members remain today. From 2021 onward, TripleLift witnessed significant declines in year-over-year revenue, disjointed and ill-prepared product and GTM initiatives, several large-scale layoffs, a burgeoning competitive market, and the erosion of our competitive edge due to subpar hiring decisions and, in some cases, retaining underperforming talent. Meanwhile, the pressures of private equity intensified with each passing month. We appointed a CEO who seems more like a ghost, tasked solely with reporting to Vista while ensuring our interest payments on the debt we incurred are met. It's noteworthy that Vista applies a playbook to its portfolio companies, and we're no exception. Examples include doubling or even tripling EBITDA within five years, enabling Vista to recapitalize, increase debt, and pay dividends to investors. This often involves significant cost-cutting measures, from employee compensation to outsourcing talent to cheaper markets like India, and extracting time from critical employees to provide updates and analyses to Vista managers rather than advancing our business. Our relatively new Chief Revenue Officer is like a bull in a china shop—an ex-Amazon employee who may fancy himself the Ted Lasso of TripleLift, though no one else shares that sentiment. Since his arrival, TripleLift has undergone a massive upheaval, some of which was necessary, but much of it detrimental to our culture and business. His arrival triggered a large-scale reorganization, leaving many without clear direction or purpose. The supply and demand teams were merged into a single Services and Revenue organization, with demand-side leadership assuming control over all aspects of our business, despite lacking background in certain areas. The teams that were instrumental in TripleLift's success are now severely resource-constrained, leading to the cessation of services for hundreds of clients. There's a palpable disconnect between our core customer and what leadership perceives it to be, with little interest in rectifying anything unrelated to our Amazon partnership. More recently, there's been a mass exodus of top talent, and it's only just beginning. 2024 is shaping up to be a make-or-break year, with the guiding lights either departed or planning to leave. We're withering on the vine, and the 2024 Operating Plan fails to consider the full extent of talent drain. Morale is at an all-time low, exacerbated by micro-managing tactics such as enforcing mandatory weekly client calls, constant internal reporting updates for ELT, implementing a three-day return-to-office policy, adopting a "do more with less" mantra, and constant reminders of how things were done at Amazon. At the very least, the Executive Leadership Team has acknowledged that TripleLift is no longer the same company it once was, and legacy employees are urged to either adapt or depart. It's become clear to me that we're no longer the company poised for greatness. We've devolved into a company rife with internal conflicts among executives and lackluster leadership, perpetuating a culture of pettiness and distrust. We're grappling with incompetence at the highest levels, battling the adverse effects of private equity ownership, and reeling from a fractured culture. It's a somber time to be at TripleLift, and I advise anyone considering joining to conduct thorough due diligence before accepting any offers.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 210 Reviews

Glassdoor has 225 TripleLift reviews submitted anonymously by TripleLift employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if TripleLift is right for you.