Wasserman Reviews

3.7

62% would recommend to a friend

(297 total reviews)
avatar

Casey Wasserman

56% approve of CEO

58% positive business outlook

Wasserman has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 297 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Wasserman employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Arts, entertainment and recreation industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

297 reviews
1.0
13 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice offices, good location in the Westwood Village, exposure to sports and entertainment

Cons

This has been my biggest professional disappointment as I enthusiastically began my job with high expectations. So far, I have encountered the worst senior leadership and company culture that I have ever experienced. The Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents have no idea how to manage an account or manage people. The only thing that senior leadership knows how to do is delegate to others and blame other people for their incompetence. Should you be a high performing employee with a strong skill-set, you will be rewarded by doing your supervisor's work and helping lower performing employees with their workload while you manage your work. Should you complain or ask for help prioritizing your workload, senior leadership will degenerate you to others and ostracize you. Also, senior leadership never provides clear direction because they have no clue as to what they are doing. It's a joke. My thoughts are similar to other reviews here. I've never experienced senior leadership that is so incompetent while so egocentric and narcissistic at the same time. The company outwardly tries to promote a "we" mentality but at the VP and above level, there is no "we". The SVPs only care about themselves. Without Casey Wasserman's name and relationships, I have no doubt that we would have lost many accounts. Casey is pretty removed from the Consulting Division's day-to-day activities, so he has no idea how bad his company’s leadership really is but here's one indication, look at all of your turnover in the past few years.

2.0
21 Apr 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good clients and interesting sports and entertainment activations

Cons

Poor leadership in the consulting division. As others have mentioned here, Vice Presidents only care about themselves and their salaries while they should be focused on actually building and motivating a team. At least 50% of the Directors have left in the past year because of poor leadership from Vice Presidents. The salaries are way below market rate. Many of the team leaders really have no clue what teamwork is about and do very little except delegate an inordinate amount of work on others. There is no consistency across teams so your experience is largely dictated by the account you're on and the leadership you're under. Read the other posts about the poor leadership as this is very true - most of the VPs only care about advancing their careers and don't have a clue how to build a team. Some accounts are led better than others but there seems to be this pervasive and arrogant mentality that any issues on a team are because of the managers and directors without looking at the Vice Presidents. To really address the issues, senior leadership would have to look at itself and based on my experience that will never happen. Leadership would rather blame others than themselves. The change has to begin at the senior level because there is gross incompetence, no team unity, poor direction and absent leadership.

2.0
7 Nov 2024

cool company in theory but unnecessarily chaotic

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

excellent clients concert/event tickets beautiful office spaces great networking opportunities

Cons

minimal training, even for entry-level toxic culture (very cliquey without explanation of workplace culture and expectations) lack of organization from management very low pay (for industry) upper management does not prioritize training or fixing problems high turnover clear favoritism unrealistic workload - everything gets delegated teams point fingers at each other internally instead of assessing and remedying systems. little to no workflows developed between teams - very much a "this is just how we do it" mentality. unclear promises of promotion lots of talk about how much revenue comes in but rarely does that trickle down to entry and mid-level staff

Viewing 1 - 3 of 297 Reviews

Glassdoor has 495 Wasserman reviews submitted anonymously by Wasserman employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Wasserman is right for you.