Pros
There's no benefits at all
Cons
I’ve been with Wizer for over two years, and I can honestly say that the arrival of Yaniv as CRO significantly damaged the working environment. The founder stepped back from managing the company, and Yaniv essentially took over as CEO, centralizing all decision-making. This "control" led to more than just a lack of any coherent sales strategy. It revealed a deep misunderstanding of basic processes like customer success and support, which quickly turned into a nightmare for many of us. Yaniv's temper flared when reality didn’t meet his unrealistic expectations, resulting in him yelling at team members and acting completely unprofessionally. Before Yaniv joined, the revenue was growing organically at a very good rate, and things were progressing well. However, after his arrival, the revenue began to decline, all thanks to the bottlenecks he created in processes and the unrealistic go-to-market campaigns he pushed forward. His mismanagement turned what was once a thriving company into a chaotic and ineffective organization. The work environment at Wizer has gone downhill under this new management, despite working with some great teammates. Yaniv’s behavior contributed to the toxicity. I was amazed when, in a meeting, he looked at one of our team members and said, “You have a great view from your window. I think I’m paying you too much!” This comment, which seemed like a casual remark, was not only inappropriate but also revealed the toxic atmosphere Yaniv created. Shouting at team members, making demeaning jokes, and storming out of meetings when upset became the norm. The micromanagement and constant contradictory instructions turned what should have been straightforward tasks into a stressful and unnecessarily complicated experience. A lot of good employees left the company, with some barely staying more than a month or two. One particularly outrageous example is when Yaniv forced a C-level manager out by hiring someone with the same responsibilities, essentially orchestrating a quiet firing. Yaniv created unbearable working conditions for the manager to the point where they had no choice but to leave. The company’s involvement in such a practice was shocking—it’s a deeply unethical way of handling things. To make matters worse, the new hire lasted only six months. Another concerning issue is the lack of compensation increases for employees taking on more responsibilities. Instead of a salary bump, you're told it’s a “new opportunity”—a weak justification for the absence of financial reward. This, combined with high turnover rates, including many who left after only a few months, paints a clear picture of Wizer's toxic culture and solidifies its reputation as a low-quality employer.
