Before getting an interview, I completed a small project that gave recruiters a sense of my research and writing skills. Then, I had two back-to-back Skype interviews with a researcher and two content directors.

The process began with a brief phone interview with a recruiter. The questions were typical, nothing out of the ordinary for the job description. Later, I was informed via email that the company wanted to move forward and I was to complete an assignment. Overall, the assignment was enjoyable for me, but was rather time consuming. Be aware/beware if you have any other commitment. After over a week, I was informed they did not want to interview me further. While I was, of course, disappointed, I was grateful the person with whom I was corresponding did so in a timely manner and kept me informed about the hiring timeline. There was a slight break down of communication at the end (further explanation of the decision was offered, I accepted, the information was never given), but I suppose that would have been the work of a very superior, considerate recruiter (I mean no offense to the recruiter) and is by no means the norm. That said, I do have a creeping feeling that I may have dodged a bullet. I only started reading the reviews of employees/former employees after receiving my rejection and I was frankly shocked! The work seems very interesting, but too many employees have reported having absolutely terrible experiences at Hanover for this to be some fluke. I would posit there are some structural or cultural issues undermining Hanover as a work place that should be addresses by management ASAP. In sum: Though I had an overall positive interview experience, I would urge those applying to read the reviews! Don’t let others make your decision to apply/accept a position, but know there is likely merit in what they are saying. You’ll find a job, you don’t need to settle if you are feeling uncertain!