I applied in-person. I interviewed at Roima Intelligence in Aug 2025
Interview
first round is aptitude (its written ) and in same paper it have coding que around 3 questions. after clearing both there is an hr interview and then after that there is an technical interview.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
que based on oops conecpt , and they ask deeply in code you writen , mostly in sql questions.strong understanding of sql is very important to crack it.
That was really bad they just done time pass and asked questions regarding hire level node js and react which was hard to answer at the and they said you are not perfect match for us
I applied through university. I interviewed at Roima Intelligence (Campus) in Aug 2025
Interview
I applied for the Computer Software Engineer role through my university’s campus placement with Roima Intelligence (Ahmedabad). Unfortunately, the overall experience was disappointing.
1. Written Test Process:
The process started with 20 MCQs, 2 medium-level coding questions, and a normalization table question. All coding had to be done on pen and paper, which felt outdated for a software engineering role. The evaluation of results took 4–5 hours with no transparency in how candidates were assessed.
2. Interview Experience:
The technical interview felt unstructured and unprofessional. Midway through, a senior member of the company disrupted the process and behaved in a way that was dismissive and disrespectful toward candidates. He laughing towards candidates. The questions asked were far beyond a fresher internship level, focusing heavily on advanced OOPs and Java concepts. Instead of problem-solving discussions, candidates were asked to write lengthy code by hand, which made the interview feel more like a classroom test than a professional assessment.
3. Bond & Policies:
The company requires selected candidates to sign a 2-year bond and provide 3 cheques worth ₹50,000. This condition feels restrictive and discouraging, especially for freshers who are just starting their careers. Instead of supporting learning and growth, the bond comes across as an attempt to tie down talent.
4. Overall Impression:
For a fresher/internship opportunity, the expectations were unrealistic, and the process lacked fairness and respect for candidates’ time. The outdated methods, long delays, and strict bond conditions left a negative impression.
Final Verdict:
I would not recommend this placement process to students looking for a transparent, respectful, and growth-oriented first opportunity.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Define this room in terms of oops concepts using all the oops principal (inheritance, abstraction, polymorphism, encapsulation)?