Argus Media Reviews

3.8

76% would recommend to a friend

(476 total reviews)

Adrian Binks

65% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

Argus Media has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 476 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Argus Media employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

476 reviews
1.0
22 Jun 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

An opportunity to expand your own contact base for professional growth outside this company.

Cons

Expect several cons if you work in the company's Asian office. Expect a salary below market value with extra long hours daily if you were born local and joining a non-managerial role. The new editorial management is prone to doubling/ tripling your workload after you join without any reason. They may also abruptly decide to change your role without prior notice and without your approval - without compensation. There is no clear advancement path in this company. Incapable people with close management relations get the promotion most of the time. The annual increment is only double digit in local currency from your second year of service. People get blacklisted from promotions for no good reason. The annual 'peer review' is one-sided (only your direct boss rates you and you get no chance of returning an evaluation). Too many employees are prone to pushing responsibility to others. If you are new, you are a target. Do not expect any training. Some teams appear competitive among themselves with an unwillingness to share knowledge. Some editors themselves are cluess about basic market knowledge. Think thrice before entering a firm like this.

1.0
19 Feb 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Location is convenient and near the subway station.

Cons

Yearly salary increments are pegged to the country’s inflation rate, meaning, no one has any motivation to work hard at all. This makes completely zero sense as why should an individual’s increment be based off an external factor like the inflation rate instead on their own personal achievements and performance? If the office is located in a country with deflation, does this mean employees have to face a pay cut? Management implicitly forces employees to look to rival PRAs or companies for an offer to use as a leverage for promotion and a higher salary. This is not a company that values loyalty or dedication. Management tries to motivate employees in other ways and telling them to look at the other “opportunities” available. Attend overseas conferences or even present at one. Attend meetings with hotshot traders etc. But remember this, no matter how well you seize these chances and do well, you are not guaranteed of any promotion or increment. The tried and tested way is to get an external offer. And so that is the ONLY OPPORTUNITY Argus can offer you - to learn as much as you can, plump up your resume, and then LEAVE the company for greener grass. Or rinse and repeat said mercenary strategy above. Because the company is so flat, it is very obvious to see those at the top vying to keep the power and benefits concentrated within the same circle. To give a simple example, in an open-plan office - the concept of which is precisely to create a sense of egalitarianism and literally remove the barriers between social classes - the CEO was personally in-charge in drawing up the seating plan to ensure everyone seats accordingly - from most senior at the back, to most junior at the front. Or another example during the most recent Townhall, when employees were told that “the lowest third will not get any pay rewards”. Leadership suffers from the Peter Principle. Those who stayed have been promoted to their level of incompetence. And because the company is so flat, they are blocking the promotion progress of those at the bottom who outperform every year into in a permanent state of oblivion until they wake up to reality and leave.

1.0
3 Apr 2025

Toxic

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good environment if you are part of the favored ones.

Cons

A company where the workplace culture was defined by gossip, manipulation, and unchecked power plays. What could have been a productive and innovative environment instead turned into a breeding ground for negativity, where the focus shifted from delivering quality work to fostering unhealthy relationships based on favoritism and office politics. The most frustrating aspect of this environment was the rampant gossip. Instead of collaborating on projects and supporting each other, colleagues spent most of their time talking behind each other’s backs, spreading rumors, and undermining each other’s reputations. Trust, a cornerstone of any successful workplace, was practically nonexistent, as no one could be sure who they could rely on. This atmosphere not only made it difficult to focus on the job at hand but also created a sense of paranoia where people were constantly worried about what others were saying behind their backs. But the gossip didn’t stop there. It was often used as a weapon to further the agendas of those in positions of power. The true toxic nature of the environment came from the way those who played the political game—those who flattered the higher-ups, avoided standing up for what was right, and simply said "yes"—were the ones who thrived. It didn’t matter if they were actually qualified or competent. The "yes-men" continued to rise through the ranks, getting promotions and recognition that they didn’t deserve. Meanwhile, good, hard-working employees, who questioned the status quo or tried to introduce new ideas, were slowly pushed out or made to feel invisible. The company culture seemed to reward conformity rather than innovation, and if you dared to speak up about issues or propose better ways of doing things, you were seen as a threat. Many employees who had the potential to make a real impact were either sidelined or let go, leaving behind a team that was less focused on progress and more concerned with staying on the good side of the powers that be. It was an environment where integrity was a liability, and silence was the price of survival. What really made the situation worse was the lack of transparency and accountability. Decisions were made behind closed doors, with no clear explanation or communication given to the team. This lack of openness further fueled the toxic atmosphere, making people feel undervalued and unheard. The few who remained in higher positions perpetuated this cycle of secrecy, ensuring that the "right" people were kept in the loop, while others were left out in the cold. In the end, this workplace was a prime example of how a toxic culture can destroy morale and undermine the true potential of a team. It was clear that talent and effort took a back seat to power struggles, favoritism, and gossip. If you're someone who values honesty, hard work, and transparency, this kind of environment will drain you rather than inspire you. It’s a sad reminder that when the wrong people are in charge, good people will often be left behind, while the ones who know how to play the game continue to rise—regardless of their ability to actually lead.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 476 Reviews

Glassdoor has 525 Argus Media reviews submitted anonymously by Argus Media employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Argus Media is right for you.