Toxic Leadership and Culture of Fear - Project Manager Black & Veatch Employee Review

1.0
23 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You can be exposed to various projects in the industry.

Cons

Unfortunately, the culture at this company is extremely toxic, starting from the very top. The CEO is one of the most ineffective leaders I’ve encountered, leading through fear rather than inspiration. This sets the tone for the rest of the leadership team, many of whom exhibit bullying behavior, especially in project meetings. It's disheartening to see that such behavior is not only tolerated but seemingly encouraged by those in senior positions. Rather than cultivating a culture of inclusion, the company has created an atmosphere of exclusivity and control. There’s a disturbing emphasis on micromanagement, like tracking office attendance, rather than trusting employees to deliver results. This lack of psychological safety, combined with an absence of accountability at the leadership level, makes it a difficult environment to thrive in.

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. Please have a meaningful conversation about your concerns with your supervisor or HR business partner.

Explore other reviews about Black & Veatch

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team to work with in SCADA

Cons

Nothing to specify.. so far everything is good

avatar
Black & Veatch Response
3w
Thank you for leaving a review! We appreciate the feedback!
1.0
2 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fair starting compensation, the team I lead is very dedicated, the onboarding process is very smooth, there are opportunities to mentor and be mentored.

Cons

The current performance management process is deeply flawed. Leaders collect ratings from managers and supervisors, then gather in a room with peers to “calibrate.” During this meeting, a predetermined percentage of employees must receive low ratings. At one point, someone referred to this as “forced ratings,” and the IT leader became visibly upset, insisting that it was not. However, I was present for the discussion: we lowered ratings, checked the spreadsheet, lowered more ratings, checked the spreadsheet again, and repeated this cycle until we hit the percentage the IT leader said had to be met. From conversations with peers outside of IT, this appears to be a common practice across the organization. Unfortunately, the approach often results in employees receiving ratings that do not accurately reflect their actual performance. These artificially lowered ratings directly affect merit increases and bonuses—even if the bonuses are relatively small—creating consequences that feel at best unfair. Regardless of what label is used, the experience felt undeniably forced.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All