Worst company to work with - Consultant Fractal Employee Review

1.0
22 May 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Good colleagues and food available in the company - Work life balance (not for all) - Srikanth is a very thoughtful person but unfortunately not many are like that in the company

Cons

- Worst Place to work in - Middle management issues are at its peak. People who don't know what is analytic and fit for just to talk are managers - Poor IT infrastructure -Everything is done for the sake of money and promotion and work ethics at its worst and people principle is a scam -Favoritism prevails throughout the company and lack of accountability throughout the company - Lack of work and firing of employees - Company creates a lot of difference among employees by creating grades and varied salary structure based on nothing but favouratism

Explore other reviews about Fractal

5.0
21 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good place to work Friendly lead

Cons

Swtiching project will be hectic

3.0
25 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company's client centricity is exceptional, with a deeply embedded focus on delivering value, reflected in a strong and loyal client base built on high levels of trust and credibility. There is a significant commitment to AI research and forward looking capabilities, alongside a clear investment in building a people first culture over time. The company is well regarded in the market with a strong foundation for continued growth

Cons

TMT suffers from ineffective leadership at the helm with little visible effort to grow capabilities or drive meaningful outcomes. Exec contribution to growth is largely absent, making the net impact negative. Cultural values are not consistently reflected in day to day execution. It has a pattern of positioning other teams negatively including Growth, Tech, AI, and PA rather than partnering, which creates real friction with them resulting in loss of opportunities. There is genuine talent within the team being held back by leadership that prioritizes internal politics over building real capability, resulting in shallow vertical capabilities. The gap between what the company expects and what leadership enables the team to deliver is significant and consistently unaddressed

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All