Good for AEM technology - Software Engineer Mastercard Employee Review

2.0
19 May 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Best company to start a career as a AEM developer as all are internal projects. Good exposure in understanding AEM. Regular visit to on-site depends upon the project and technology. Exposure to New tools in a very short period. Good support from co-workers and regular training sessions on the latest technologies. Good work culture and flexible working hours depends upon the project.

Cons

The worst leadership and management ever seen...... Playing very bad politics on contract employees. No timings for full time employees. Will have a pressure in the project if it isn't managed well from the beginning. Company lacks behind in identifying the talented people. There were lot of talented people in the company, everyone quit. I initially felt stupids why are they leaving. But now I realize. Most of all permanent employees are their relatives of management. shows lot of difference between full time employees and contract employees. Work pressure is only on Contract employees. No value of work. Such a rude politics.....

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
24 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture. Stable. Analytical and rewarding if you find the right product.

Cons

Slower career growth. Not as influential

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All