employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Melbourne Water

Is this your company?

Disappointing - Anonymous employee Melbourne Water Employee Review

1.0
18 Jun 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The employees at below-manager level are generally good to work with and genuinely trying to do a good job The work is meaningful and interesting Training opportunities

Cons

Internal politics and lack of cooperation between managers of different groups means employees are given conflicting instructions , which leads to little being accomplished and a lot of frustration. Most managers only care about their image and climbing the ladder, not about doing what is best for the company. There is a lot of talk about 'well being' and 'work-life balance' but that is just lip service.

Explore other reviews about Melbourne Water

5.0
10 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Money is nice to get

Cons

Money could be better to get

1.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay arrives on time every fortnight.

Cons

Working at Melbourne Water is a masterclass in how to turn a well-funded organisation into a productivity graveyard. The bureaucracy is so thick it actively smothers competence, initiative, and any remaining motivation an employee might arrive with. Management operates in a parallel universe where meetings replace outcomes and policy documents replace thinking. Decisions take months, accountability takes years, and responsibility somehow never lands upward. When things go wrong which they often do blame is quietly redistributed to whoever is least protected, not whoever made the call. Processes are convoluted for no reason other than tradition. Systems are outdated, communication is incoherent, and priorities change so often that long-term planning is effectively impossible. You’re expected to hit moving targets while being criticised for not standing still. Performance management feels arbitrary and defensive. Feedback is vague, reactive, and usually delivered only when someone needs a scapegoat. High performers are rewarded with more work and less support, while underperformers are preserved by the very systems meant to address them. The culture rewards compliance over competence. Question inefficiency and you’re labelled “difficult.” Try to improve something and you’ll be reminded that “this is how it’s always been done.” Over time, capable employees either burn out, shut up, or leave often replaced by process, not people. Morale is low, trust is lower, and the organisation feels more focused on protecting itself than delivering value or supporting staff.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All