employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Method Communications

Is this your company?

STAY AWAY - Social Media Method Communications Employee Review

1.0
24 May 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great downtown office location close to BART

Cons

Disorganized management, favoritism, unstable environment, poor communication with employees. Managers belittle employees and only promote their “friends”. Company is full of cliques and staff will exclude you if you are not a part of one. Managers do not take the time to train new employees and will not provide even minimal feedback on projects. If you are interested in gaining some PR agency experience, i suggest you look elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about Method Communications

3.0
14 Mar 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Method Communications fosters an environment where employees can drop the corporate facade and be their authentic selves, which made it easy to build strong relationships with coworkers. The work culture is generally kind and supportive. PTO and paid holidays are generous, which helped with work-life balance to a degree.

Cons

There is a toxic, politically driven atmosphere within the leadership team. This undermines morale and often leads to confusion about company priorities. I experienced multiple rounds of permanent headcount reductions in my department, resulting in an overwhelming increase in workload without adequate compensation adjustments or recognition. As a result, my performance suffered due to burnout and a lack of support. While the coaches at Method are talented individual contributors, they possess little to no actual management or coaching experience. The absence of a leadership training program meant that many employees struggled with navigating the demands of their roles, which quickly turns into a mental health risk for teams. Despite being a growing company, there was no ERP system in place to support the $5M/year business. Technology constraints, sometimes stemming from directives from the holding company, hindered overall operational efficiency. A more proactive approach in advocating for the right tools would have benefited the company in the long run.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All