Scrupulous Policies - Customer Success Manager Tatvic Analytics Employee Review

1.0
24 Jul 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. One of the best places to hone your skill sets early career

Cons

1. Very Hideous Behaviour. The HR team updates the policies on Google Doc without informing changes (When the employee realizes they have been fooled they have no escape). 2. The CEO manages the whole environment read micro manages, if you dont toe the line then you will be kicked out. 3. The management practices the behaviour of recording the client calls (the client is not aware of the same) 4. High Handedness and forcible exit, recently one of the resource was asked to put down the paper or be part of PIP. And if he doesnt qualify the PIP , his feedback will be shared with client as non performer. Arm twisting 5. One of the resource resigned and left the organisation , in his FnF he was given 30% of salary. Reason furnished by HR, the employee was only 30% efficient as per his manager during the notice period. 6. CEO abuses in the choicest of slangs and doesn't have control over his temper, that too even in front female employees 7. The HR doesn't have a single employee who has done masters in HRM or any relevant degree

Explore other reviews about Tatvic Analytics

4.0
6 Jan 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free snacks, No dress code, Flexible time, Flat Hierarchy, Great benefits, Team outings, Team sports

Cons

Failing to control politics with increasing team size

avatar
Tatvic Analytics Response
5y
We have some practices to create best working environment. We encourage hearing employees voice, will want to understand your concern in better way. But appreciate you putting good words and feedback here :) Thank you!
1.0
1 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Peer collaboration is generally positive Experience that teaches what not to do in leadership

Cons

The core problem with this company is the extreme centralisation of power with one person and not with management. Almost all decisions across teams are made by one individual, leaving HODs and managers with little to no authority and teams with no real voice. What should be collaborative leadership feels more like unilateral rule. This single person's control leads directly to chaos. Priorities change frequently, policies are revised without explanation, and teams are forced to redo work because decisions are reversed on a whim. There is no consistency, no ownership, and no accountability. Managers do not stand up for their teams, even when employees are clearly right. Instead of challenging incorrect decisions, they pass them down, creating frustration and disengagement at every level. As a result, internal politics thrive. Employees focus more on staying aligned with the decision maker than on doing quality work. Merit, data, and ground reality take a back seat, while morale and trust steadily decline. Despite visible signs of damage, rising attrition, and declining outcomes, there is little willingness at the leadership level to pause, reflect, or course correct. The same decisions are repeated, pushing the organization steadily toward risk rather than recovery. The issue is not a lack of talent but a lack of shared leadership. Until decision-making is distributed, feedback is genuinely valued, and managers are trusted and empowered to lead, the organisation will continue to struggle under the weight of centralised, one-person control.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All