Pros
1) The company operates in a very niche domain of DAP and is one of the key players in this market. 2) The company's product idea is awesome. 3) People here are talented, hardworking and hustle a lot. 4) Management is transparent. 5) Pay is good.
Cons
1) The management has mandated employees to work from office full time, all 5 days a week. While this may be required for certain divisions such as Sales or customer facing teams, it is definitely not required for the Engineering team. The rationale for asking people to come to office all 5 days a week, especially for engineering folks, is not very clear and certainly not required. Plus, there is no transport facility either. 2) The company follows it's 'Hustle Mode On' culture very seriously. I have hustled a lot, but the kind of hustling Whatfix has, is on a whole new level, even for me. While this mode of working might suit some, it cannot be said as true for everybody. In fact, some introverted folks, find it very hard and draining, as the work demands lots of co-ordination with loads of people. There's a lot of ambiguity with the task at hand and information is concealed or unavailable and can be understood only through reaching out to other people and they in fact either ask us to reach out to some other people or ask a lot of counter questions. In the end, one is made to run from pillar to post in this maze of people. 3) Again, in relation to point 2, especially in engineering, no one seems to know the code base properly and only the few colleagues who somewhat know it, do not share their knowledge with others openly, thereby creating a dependency on them. There is not much documentation either and even if you find one, it is incomplete and outdated/incorrect and needs constant change. I've observed this happening in many teams in engineering. People who know something think that other people must figure out things for themselves and tend to sort of conceal information or at best talk in a jargon language that just goes above everyone's head. Expecting people to contribute without providing the necessary information or KT comes across as quite hostile. I feel that the reasons for such behavior are these - a) People who already know something can contribute significantly better than someone who doesn't know a great deal, and yes they do that. It hence helps them gain visibility and appreciation from the management. So they are not interested in sharing their knowledge and making things any easier for the juniors or the newly joined folks. Even experienced people struggle a lot due to this. b) Because they add value this way, their chances of getting promoted is much higher than someone who is still struggling to hustle amongst these very folks and understand the code base. c) The management also tends to incentivize such people and hence their behavior is justified and solidified. 4) There is a lot of work pressure here. Also, there is a concept of a success engineer, which is nothing but a developer who is put into production support on a rotational basis for a period of 2 or 3 weeks. The pressure on employees during this period is extremely high. So, to summarize, Whatfix does not come across as a good place to work. Instead, it comes across as a highly activitistic, but soul-lacking corporate.
Pros
Whatfix is a great place to work if you enjoy a fast-paced, high-growth environment. The team is collaborative, driven, and supportive, and there are plenty of opportunities to take ownership and make a real impact.
Cons
Pace can be intense, and priorities may shift as the company scales. Global collaboration across time zones can be challenging.
Pros
- top 10 percentile compensation, timely pay, straightforward PTO/leave policy - Decent benefits package, lunch provided, quick reimbursements, good per diem during travel - Some genuinely smart and talented coworkers who try their best despite blockers - Opportunity for international travel and exposure to premier enterprise clients in what is supposed to be a "fun to sell" space
Cons
- The company has been bleeding VERY senior people with lots of institutional knowledge for the past year - Lots of customer churn: hypergrowth narrative is breaking and leadership is panicking and instituting reactive solutions - As a seller, expect the product to not work 70% of the time but be held responsible for it - New joiners are given zero relevant training. You'll be put through hours of product knowledge sessions from "sales enablement" but zero help on anything that matters, such as navigating the illogical CRM + CLM -the internal politics and processes to get anything approved and general apathy that seems to be infiltrating the company. Expect chasing 10 people for one simple task and it being backlogged due to layoffs/understaffing in key teams such as RD and Bids - most are waiting for the next layoff or ridiculous policy change with offers in hand (much better packages as well) - drastically worsening micromanagement, draconian HR/WFO policies treating employees like schoolchildren, resulting in a general culture of fear/compliance - expect to spend more time on admin and writing reports + powerpoints than anything else - no psychological safety to disagree with leadership: only one person's word goes in the sales org. - one race/culture dominates Two paths: company to push forward for an IPO in 2027, or layoff half the company if/when it fails.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.