Netgain Reviews

2.6

41% would recommend to a friend

(70 total reviews)

Sumeet Sabharwal

48% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

Netgain has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 70 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Netgain employee rating is 32% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

70 reviews
3.0
18 Oct 2022

System Analyst

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good working place to be work at.

Cons

Management not listening to suggestion

Netgain Response
3y
Thank you for your feedback. It's disappointing that you felt a lack of support during your tenure here at Netgain. I welcome any additional insight. Please feel free to reach out to me directly via email.
2.0
8 Jan 2019

No Longer Viable

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The most intelligent, amazing coworkers on earth (many of whom are in the process of seeking employment elsewhere).

Cons

After the company was sold to an investment firm, the original owner/president was replaced with a CEO who single-mindedly focuses on revenue-on-paper instead of running a profitable company. He has hired on a handful of C-levels and VPs from external candidates, injecting a whole new layer of management/bureaucracy into the organization. The company spends irresponsibly on perquisites for new C-level/VPs/Sales Executives. Primary among these is a new executive office in Minnetonka, separate from the existing Field Service office in Minneapolis. There are numerous other examples employees are aware of, but could be considered confidential and are excluded from this review. These costs are, of course, in addition to the salaries of several new C-levels/VPs. Employees are treated as disposable. The CEO has callously suggested entire technical teams are replaceable. Leadership even implemented a layoff and hired on contract workers. (This is in direct contrast with how the company used to be managed, where "respect for individuals" was a genuine value of the previous leaders.) As a result of leadership's disregard, there's been significant turnover within the organization. Meanwhile, leadership has been ignoring the obvious operational issues associated with onboarding new employees to replace long-term hires that have left. Due to the emphasis on new revenue and the intentional and unintentional reduction in headcount, there is very poor work/life balance for technical/operational employees. For salaried employees, there's no policy or mechanism to collect extra hours worked (compensatory time) and rarely a good time to use accrued PTO. Many employees sit at the PTO cap and feel unable to utilize their accrued PTO. Netgain's C-suite has also acquired two other cloud hosting organizations recently. One acquisition was conducted prior to performing any in-depth review of existing technical operations. The result has been large amounts of Netgain effort spent performing break-fixes on unfamiliar infrastructure without any ability to realize revenue for that time. HR seems overly concerned about relocating staff between different offices or cubicles and strictly less concerned about the general wellbeing and development of competent, productive employees. The list goes on... sadly.

Netgain Response
7y
We’re sorry this is how you’re feeling. Based on the frustrations you’ve expressed, it sounds like there are opportunities to improve communication channels to avoid future misunderstandings. On January 3, 2019, we announced that an anonymous feature was live, utilizing one of our current feedback mechanisms and will continue to be available on a quarterly basis. If you feel there are opportunities to improve communication, have questions or ideas on where we can do better, we want to hear from you. You are also welcome to share your feedback with your manager. We have internal mechanisms to collect feedback, and ask that in the future you use those internal avenues first so we can address any issues early enough before they bubble up to the point where you feel you need to air them in a public forum. You ask for more transparency throughout the organization, and transparency needs to go both ways. This is why some of our feedback channels are not anonymous. It is important for us to be able to work directly with individuals who have questions and concerns, so we can address that feedback one-on-one. We know that a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach rarely works for everyone.
1.0
10 Sept 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazingly talented, passionate and friendly team members! They are always willing to help with issues. I am going to miss that!

Cons

* Overworked and underpaid. * Standards have gone by the wayside. * Massive disconnect between leadership and technicians (leadership does not understand what the techs do). * ZERO work life balance. They recently laid off a number of staff (from an already thinning herd). We are now struggling to keep up with our day to day work, let alone all of the break fixes and special requests from clients. There is no plan for employee retention. None. It is almost like they want the remaining team to leave so they can show profit in the books and sell the company. Management does not understand what the downstream teams do. All they know is that "it gets done". They also don't want to understand what we do, or how we do it. They are under the impression that whatever that may be, is old, archaic and it can be updated. So they hired a group of engineers to a new DevOps team recently, with the vision of automating what we do. However, that team has started from the ground up, revamping how everything is done. How servers are built, how applications are installed. Management is counting on this DevOps team's work to be the magic bullet that will fix it all. It is great that they are doing that and introducing new technologies, but we will not see an impact of that work anytime in the near future - it will be 6 to 8 months (at least) before anything comes to light. The plan until such time is... just fix it. We have no subject matter experts anymore. They all left. We have L1 technicians troubleshooting senior engineer issues. It is taking weeks to resolve issues, all the while the clients are complaining. To make matters worse, they have not replaced any of the staff that left. There is no action plan to fill the gap when a resignation is received. The plan is "let's add what they did to someone else's plate". They just keep piling on more and more work on to the remaining techs. They recently posted a few positions, but that doesn't even account for 1% of the lost staff. There is also no effort to retain the remaining talent. None. 10-12 hours work days are normal. Weekends? Just another work day for most of us. We are answering emails and messages at all hours of the day. The staff are exhausted. They are tired. The quality of work is dropping. Fast. Clients are starting notice the change in quality. It is taking longer to resolve simple issues. Basic technical tasks are getting skipped, in favor of the latest fire that needs to be put out.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 70 Reviews

Glassdoor has 70 Netgain reviews submitted anonymously by Netgain employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Netgain is right for you.