Pros
Remote work, paid winter break, easily approved pto
Cons
Imagine a company strategic enough to actually understand where its talent sits and move people into positions where their skills and expertise would create the most impact. This is not that company. Instead of recognizing and elevating top talent, the company clings to rigid, arbitrary career paths that require employees to sit in the same role for years, regardless of performance or capability. Meanwhile, some move up quickly, not because of merit, but because they happen to be favored by senior leadership. What’s truly baffling is that amid constant transitions, crises, and organizational “restructuring,” no one seems willing to ask the obvious question: what if the problem isn’t a lack of talent, but where this talent is allowed to exist within the organization? What if the issue isn’t top-performing people earning more money, but low-performing or outright incompetent leaders earning the most while taking credit for the work and impact of their truly capable reports? The company doesn’t need to look far for strong leaders. They already have people who deserve far more responsibility and recognition but advancement is routinely blocked, preventing them from holding the titles and influence they have clearly earned. It’s a frustrating environment if you care about impact, fairness, or actual leadership.
