SMYAL Reviews

3.1

47% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)

44% positive business outlook

SMYAL has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 17 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there.

Reviews by job title

17 reviews
1.0
12 Jul 2017

No

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not one single thing at all.

Cons

I dreaded going to work every single day. The executive director an egotistical and disrespectful human being who has no business working with young people or any organization that is meant to empower people. He is not a leader and should be ashamed of himself and the ways he has dragged SMYAL into the ground. This also makes me question the board of directors who are a group of people allowing this to continue. People have complained and raised concerns, whistle blown, shown receipts of malpractice. Still nothing. This really shows how expendable staff and inadvertently, the youth are. The priorities of this organization are motivated by money and in no way do they care about the community they are meant to serve.

1.0
16 Aug 2017

Exploitative Executive Director

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working at SMYAL began as one of the most rewarding experiences of my career. The young people that SMYAL serves are fun, talented, challenging and inspiring. I was afforded the flexibility to be creative, and thoughtful in my work with them.

Cons

The positive work experience quickly turned sour when the current Executive Director, Sultan Shakir, was hired. His disinterest in the needs and lives of young people was immediately palpable. What's worse was his disregard for the talent, skill, work ethic and well-being of his employees. In a matter of months he turned a highly effective staff of 7 FT 1 PT into a burnt-out, over-burdened staff of 3 FT 1 PT. It became clear through his hiring and firing practices that his first priority was not the youth we served, or even the mission of the organization, it was chasing money and promoting himself. Under his leadership the organization has lost its moral center. Simple practices of professionalism went out the window. As a program manager I made repeated requests to see a budget for the programs I was running, including the amount of funds raised that were earmarked to those programs. My requests were ignored--not even denied. As a result I was forced to run programs and plan events with no knowledge of the available funds. Finally, the huge disparity in salary between the ED and the highest paid program staff member was appalling. His starting salary as ED was more than double that of the highest paid program staff member, to say nothing of junior and part time staff. We watched as he insisted on funding his own salary with grant funds and generally mismanaging the grant from which a program staff member was being paid fully--loss of the grant would have meant loss of their job. Meanwhile he made unilateral decisions to change our health insurance plan to reduce overhead costs all the while underpaying a highly skilled and overwork set of employees. He hired and fired countless temps to attempt to patch up the tattered remnants of the full staff he destroyed and never saw fit to invest in the people he was working into the ground. When the bathrooms broke and were unusable employees and youth had to find public restrooms to use for 4 months while he shopped around for a good price to repair them. Needless to say not only is this unsanitary and a violation of OSHA, it is also particularly dangerous for trans and gender non-conforming staff and youth who frequent the organization and are supposed to be served by the organization. While I can understand the organization being strapped for cash not once did reducing his over-inflated salary come into conversation as a possible way to alleviate the burden on the organization—too say nothing of the expenses paid out in the name of “fund-raising.” Sadly the list of exploitative, unethical, and border-line illegal actions that Sultan perpetrated goes on and on. Despite multiple attempts to confront him directly, or to blow the whistle on his behavior to key funders and the Board nothing has changed and in the end the community of young LGBTQ people in DC suffered and continues to suffer.

4.0
7 Dec 2017

SMYAL is a good place to work

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It is so rewarding to work with such amazing youth who are overcoming challenges on a daily basis. The team dynamic really makes for a welcoming environment.

Cons

As with any small organization, it requires staff members to wear multiple hats to ensure that the work gets done. Although it is getting better, compensation for most employees could be higher. We have a lot of new staff members, so it has taken a bit of time for the team to gel, but now we are working much more effectively.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 17 SMYAL reviews submitted anonymously by SMYAL employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SMYAL is right for you.