Vertis Digital Reviews

3.1

56% would recommend to a friend

(15 total reviews)

48% positive business outlook

Vertis Digital has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 15 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there.

Reviews by job title

15 reviews
1.0
22 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The organization serves as a stark case study in 'startup culture' pitfalls. Beyond the basic provision of a workspace, there are no competitive advantages, cultural benefits, or professional incentives that would distinguish this company favorably against any other employer in the Singapore market.

Cons

Prospective candidates should view this organization as a last resort. While the company markets itself as a modern startup with an "employee-first" culture, the internal reality is defined by stagnant workflows, professional immaturity at the leadership level, and a lack of functional processes. Leadership and Corporate Governance The organization operates less like a meritocratic startup and more like a non-transparent family business. Conflict of Interest: High-level management positions are often filled based on family ties rather than competency, leading to severe conflicts of interest. Lack of Accountability: Senior leadership frequently lacks the technical or operational expertise required for their roles. Consequently, they avoid accountability, often delegating their core responsibilities to "favorites" while taking the credit themselves. Political Favoritism: Career progression is dictated by political alignment rather than performance. Those who succeed are typically those willing to compensate for management’s lack of output. Discrepancy in HR and Recruitment The recruitment process presents a misleading image of the company culture. False Promises: Claims regarding work-life balance, work flexibility, remote flexibility, and "fast-track" growth are largely fabricated during the interview stage. HR Neutrality: Human Resources does not function as an objective department for employee relations. Instead, it operates as a personal administrative arm for the CEO and CTO. Employee grievances are rarely addressed, leading to high turnover in the company and even within the HR department itself. Operational Environment and Work-Life Balance The work culture is characterized by extreme overextension and a lack of boundaries. Burnout Culture: "Working day and night" and through weekends is an unofficial requirement. There is no additional compensation or recognition for this level of exertion. it is treated as the baseline expectation and CTO, CEO approves it. Stifled Innovation: While a small minority of talented professionals attempt to implement industry-standard processes, their efforts are consistently undermined by a leadership group that views modernized workflows as a threat to their established habits. Advice for Candidates Interns: Avoid this environment, as it lacks the professional structure necessary for foundational learning. You risk developing poor professional habits. Mid-to-Senior Level: Your expertise will likely be ignored. New implementations are often blocked, yet you will be held accountable for the systemic failures of others. General Advice: Do not be swayed by financial offers or verbal promises. The cost to your mental health and professional ethics outweighs the monetary gain.

1.0
16 Jan 2026

Think twice before joining this company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Trauma bonding with your colleagues

Cons

I would not recommend joining this company unless you have no other options. There is a lack of proper guidance and support, so it’s not an environment suited for learning or professional growth. Several senior project managers struggle with basic team and project management, often offloading their responsibilities while giving the impression of being constantly busy. Clients have raised complaints about them on multiple occasions, yet upper management’s response has largely been to reassign them to different projects rather than address the root issues. As a result, team members are often treated more like personal assistants than professionals, expected take on tasks that are not within their job scope rather than supported as part of a well-managed team.

1.0
13 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Few workplaces offer such a comprehensive and accelerated education in organisational red flags. In a remarkably short time, employees gain exposure to a wide spectrum of leadership styles, decision-making practices, and workplace dynamics that many professionals might otherwise only encounter gradually over the course of an entire career. The experience provides invaluable clarity on the types of management behaviour, communication patterns, and organisational cultures one should be cautious of moving forward. By the time you leave, you’ll likely have developed a highly refined instinct for identifying warning signs early; from misaligned priorities and reactive leadership to environments where accountability and structure are more aspirational than operational. In many ways, it serves as a formative professional experience: the kind that permanently sharpens your judgement and ensures that in future roles, even the faintest hint of similar patterns will stand out immediately. It’s difficult to replicate this level of concentrated learning anywhere else, and it certainly makes evaluating future opportunities much easier.

Cons

What should be basic fundamentals in any functioning company are strangely difficult to find here. From delivery teams to internal departments, there is a persistent inability to define responsibilities clearly or execute them with any real confidence. People are placed into positions they appear underprepared for, and instead of support or direction, the default response is confusion layered on top of more confusion. Even internal teams struggle to get the basics right, resulting in an organisation where things move slowly, decisions are unclear, and accountability is almost impossible to locate. There is also an impressive volume of promises relative to the amount of actual change that occurs. Employee surveys are conducted, feedback is collected, and there are regular mentions of improvements to benefits, culture, and employee welfare. Unfortunately, these conversations rarely lead to anything tangible. The cycle tends to repeat itself: listen, acknowledge, discuss, and then quietly move on without addressing the underlying issues. Over time it becomes clear that many of these initiatives serve more as reassurance than genuine attempts at improvement. Strategic initiatives suffer from the same lack of coherence. Direction changes frequently, different stakeholders say different things, and decisions appear to belong to everyone and no one at the same time. What should be a clear technical development and delivery often ends up feeling like a room full of headless chickens debating what to do while the teams responsible for execution are left repeatedly pivoting to accommodate the latest interpretation of the plan. Perhaps the most difficult aspect is the distribution of authority. Significant influence sits with individuals who often demonstrate little understanding of the work they are responsible for overseeing. At the same time, accountability is almost nonexistent, and constructive feedback rarely travels upward in a meaningful way. The environment ends up feeling less like a professional organisation and more like a playground where alliances matter more than competence. If you happen to align with the right people, things are easier. If you don’t, you quickly discover that raising problems is treated as being the problem. Ultimately, the company does provide one extremely valuable takeaway: it is an unforgettable masterclass in recognising what a dysfunctional organisation looks like in practice. Many professionals spend years gradually learning to identify warning signs in leadership, culture, and strategy. Here, you get the full curriculum in record time. It’s the kind of experience that permanently sharpens your instincts, because once you’ve worked here, even the faintest hint of similar behaviour anywhere else will feel like a five-alarm fire.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 15 Reviews

Glassdoor has 17 Vertis Digital reviews submitted anonymously by Vertis Digital employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Vertis Digital is right for you.