Completely dysfunctional - IT Operations Dow Employee Review

2.0
7 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People I've worked with tend to be nice.

Cons

Multiple meetings about the same project with different project leaders. Some of my colleagues spend the majority of their time in Teams meetings that could be summed up in a group chat/email. Throwing money out the door with unused software and equipment. Inefficiencies everywhere you look. Left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, very siloed. They talk a big game about all the advanced things they are doing but are literally not doing any of them. So much middle management nothing gets done. Promotes shadow IT because of draconian policies that do the opposite of securing the organization. Trying their best to outsource everything to unqualified vendors. Typical large bureaucracy that has lost it's way. Management doesn't care and doesn't want feedback.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
16 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Cons

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
22 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All