An good starting point but not a long term plan - Associate Recruiter Russell Tobin Employee Review

2.0
22 Feb 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Team members and the ability to work with big name clients

Cons

The toxicity and lack of care for employees bye Leo Russell is truly the biggest con. One can tell a lot from a company by how they handled Covid19, and Russell Tobins reactions speaks volumes. Forcing offices to open in the midst of a pandemic, firing and furloughing top performers, and an overall unwillingness to get with the times and allow remote work due to the CEO’s unwillingness to let go. I will never forget Leo Russell telling a female black employee during a a company wide meeting that she needed to find child care and come into the office or risk her job at the high point of Covid. After hearing that I knew this is absolutely NOT a company my values align with.

Explore other reviews about Russell Tobin

5.0
24 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I have worked at other agencies and Russell Tobin outweighs all of them positively. I feel supported, and like my contribution matters. Management is approachable and wants to see you succeed. Hybrid flexibility is a plus and the office is in a great location with free parking!

Cons

None that I can think of at the moment.

1.0
18 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

On the surface, this company employs many genuinely decent human beings, especially on the recruiter level. Unfortunately, the culture and leadership structure ensure that those people struggle to succeed.

Cons

The environment is steeped in toxic masculinity, where aggression, dominance, and performative confidence (especially from those who don't understand the industry or have never recruited) are rewarded over collaboration, empathy, or competence. Bullying behavior is normalized, often disguised as “directness” or “high standards,” and there is little accountability when it comes from the right people. Management regularly pits employees against one another, sometimes through surprise or random video calls designed to catch people off guard. These interactions feel less about problem-solving and more about “gotcha” moments—intending to embarrass and expose, while creating tension within the organization. This fosters fear, not excellence, and actively discourages trust or teamwork. Employees are not treated as people—they are treated as salaries and line items. Burnout is common, yet dismissed. Human concerns are framed as weaknesses. In meetings, it is not uncommon for a senior leader to tell women to “smile more,” reinforcing a culture that is out of step with even basic professional norms. At the top, the prevailing goal among senior leaders appears to be self-preservation, as they are promoted beyond their capabilities. Many seem focused on collecting paychecks and avoiding disruption, fully aware that their compensation far exceeds what they could command elsewhere. As a result, meaningful change is avoided, difficult conversations are postponed indefinitely, and dysfunction persists.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All