Gate One Reviews

2.9

48% would recommend to a friend

(92 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Tye

41% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Gate One has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 92 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Gate One employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

92 reviews
3.0
4 Feb 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fun team, nice people most of the time. Some interesting work. Good salary (until you work out the hourly rate).

Cons

Internal politics and cliques are much more prominent than you would expect at such a small firm. You have no say in the type of work you are put on - particularly while the company "trades their way" out of Covid-19. Once in a client role, minimal support is provided - everyone seems too stretched, there's no time for on-the-job coaching and/or support. As it's a small firm, everyone is expected to help out in extracurricular activities (writing thought leadership, organising events, or developing client propositions) on top of client work, in order to be favoured at promotion time. Continuous professional development is really not a priority.

1.0
16 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- You have Glassdoor to warn you and I have posted this before I leave Gate One

Cons

- The company has gone downhill and most conversations are around people actively looking for roles elsewhere rather than long-term growth at the firm. - A substantial amount of talent left in a short period of time including several senior leaders, resulting in a loss of experience, continuity, and stability. - One very senior leadership departure occurred suddenly and was never addressed transparently, leading to widespread speculation internally and a loss of trust in the senior leadership team. - The firm has repeatedly failed to meet targets, resulting in no company bonus on multiple occasions. - There have been no pay rises for several years, including no adjustments to recent inflation, despite increasing expectations and responsibilities. - Colleagues are frequently charged out to clients at grades above their actual pay grade, yet promotion opportunities do not consistently reflect the level of responsibility or work being delivered. - The promotion process feels inconsistent and overly focused on business development and revenue generation, often at the expense of people development and fair progression. - Senior leadership appears heavily focused on business development and revenue generation, often at the expense of people development and fair progression. - Expectations around business development and "building the business" have increased significantly alongside already demanding client delivery workloads. - As a result, burnout is widespread, with a number of colleagues having been signed off work due to stress and pressure.

1.0
28 Mar 2026

Proceed with caution

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

See below for my review

Cons

This review is intended as a genuine and helpful warning to anyone considering joining. Progression is extremely difficult and often feels misaligned with actual performance. There is a constant expectation to deliver high-quality, demanding client work while also selling work, contributing to business development, and building the business. These expectations sit on top of already heavy workloads and are not always realistically achievable or fairly recognised. It is common practice to be staffed and charged out to clients at a grade above your current level. You are expected to operate at that higher level without receiving the corresponding salary, title, or financial reward. Over time, this creates frustration, especially when promotion decisions do not reflect the level you are already working at. The promotion process lacks transparency and can feel highly political. There is a strong perception of favouritism in promotion panels, which undermines trust in the system. Even with strong delivery and clear contributions, outcomes can feel inconsistent and not purely merit-based. There is also a sense that HR holds significant influence over progression decisions, and this has contributed to a decline in respect for senior leadership across parts of the firm. Advice to Potential Candidates: If your priority is clear and merit-based career progression, you should think carefully before joining. Many would be better off staying where they are rather than moving into an environment where progression can feel uncertain, political, and not aligned to performance.

avatar
Gate One Response
1w
Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback, we’re sorry this has been a negative experience for you. You’ve stated that your review is “intended as a genuine and helpful warning to anyone considering joining” and throughout your review you mainly reference the promotion process and at the end you write, “Advice to Potential Candidates: If your priority is clear and merit-based career progression, you should think carefully before joining. Many would be better off staying where they are rather than moving into an environment where progression can feel uncertain, political, and not aligned to performance.” We’re genuinely sorry that your experience of the promotion process has been personally disappointing. We urge any potential new joiners to ask during the recruitment process how promotions work at Gate One because unlike many other consulting firms, we have taken many steps for promotions not to be political or for there to be favouritism. A major step being that each promotion panel of 8 people consists of different SLT members (except for 2 ‘consistency’ members and 2 People & Talent members). Panel members are selected to be as diverse as possible in terms of different sectors/practices/accounts as well as their personal characteristics. While the promotion panel process introduced in 2024 was designed from external best practice benchmarking via an external consultancy, the People & Talent team are the ‘custodians’ of the process to ensure fairness and consistency but they don’t hold any more “power” over other promotion panel members – decisions on whether to promote or not are by unanimous decision making or vast majority. We recognise that balancing excellent client delivery, business development and internal contribution can be stretching at times, we agree with you that expectations need to be realistic (starting with agreeing reasonable objectives) and sustainable for the good of everyone’s wellbeing. Workload and expectations is a key focus on the new EVP Evolution ‘change the business’ initiative so please do feed in your views to your employee engagement network rep. You also reference the experience of being sold on client work at a higher grade than your current one. This isn’t hugely common practice but stretch opportunities are an important part of development at Gate One, but we agree that the stretch shouldn’t continue over a long period before someone is promoted to that grade. As an SLT we are working together more closely to ensure being sold at the grade above is limited and is closely aligned with promotion trajectory. Being sold at the grade above isn’t a reason in itself to promote someone, just like not being sold at the grade above isn’t a reason in itself to withhold a promotion. Thank you again for sharing your perspective.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 92 Reviews

Glassdoor has 97 Gate One reviews submitted anonymously by Gate One employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Gate One is right for you.