employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Promontory Financial Group

Is this your company?

Promontory Financial Group Reviews

3.3

52% would recommend to a friend

(202 total reviews)
avatar

Eugene Ludwig

68% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Promontory Financial Group has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 202 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Promontory Financial Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

202 reviews
1.0
14 Nov 2015

A trainwreck in progress

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Generous PTO (if your managers let you use it). Near gender balance at all levels within the firm. High pay if you have certain niche expertise or are a former senior regulator. Free drinks. Nice holiday party.

Cons

Everything else. Employees typically have no say over what projects they are assigned to and no ability to transfer between projects. Little effort is made to match projects with one's interests, skills, or career development goals. Career advancement is very difficult and extremely political. New incentive policies for senior managers disincentivize investing in or promoting junior team members. Many junior employees end up leaving bitter after promised promotions do not materialize. Several employees have been summarily fired because of minor disputes with managers. Pay used to be quite competitive across the board. Over the past year bonuses have been significantly slashed. Note the dates of other reviews praising compensation levels. Management has informed infrastructure and junior staff that they are overpaid and that compensation will be aligned more to commodity levels going forward. Profitability is down and expenses are soaring due to rapid and poorly executed expansion into new areas and high legal and PR expenses. The most glaring problem is the thick layer of semi-retired senior regulators at the MD level who do little beyond fighting with each other yet enjoy astronomical pay packages. As widely reported in the media, the firm recently paid a large fine to settle an inquiry into past failings. All of this has taken a toll on the firm's morale, reputation and business development efforts. Turnover is high and increasing.

1.0
3 Aug 2017

Hell on Earth

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice offices. Free premium band bottled water. If you’re related to senior management or can build an “adopted child” rapport with one of the few powerful MDs you’ll get plum assignments, massively better pay than your peers, and rapid advancement all while massive mistakes are overlooked. Only a few have managed to do this, but the rewards are fantastic if you can pull it off.

Cons

+The work environment is toxic. There are some very bad apples here, particularly at the Director level. On several occasions, clients have had to intervene on behalf of junior employees being verbally abused by Directors at a client site. +Employees don’t even bother going to our internal HR anymore as HR couldn’t care or do less about even the most egregious conduct. +The recent positive reviews are clearly fake. Instead of addressing issues, management or HR has resorted to writing fake reviews. Read them and judge for yourself. This is representative of the firm’s ethics and approach to "addressing" issues. +Nepotism is rampant. There has been many complaints about this, which I thought would lead to reforms. However, it seems all the complaints lead to was more senior people asking for favors for their relatives. +The firm is poorly managed across the board. There are way too many senior people for the amount of work we have, yet we keep hiring more. All despite never-ending cuts to existing employee bonuses and pay. +Some MDs are way too fond of the young females hires. +It can’t be emphasized enough how sharply pay has declined in recent years. "industry leading to industry joke" is the joke. +Some teams send employees overseas for months at a time on a few days notice, without regard to personal constraints or preferences. When the firm is covering travel expenses, you’ll be chewed out and threatened with termination if you even spend half of what is supposedly permitted under company policy. +Bonus disparity is massive and completely lacks any relationship to merit, tenure, or level. +Management is very dishonest. Willingness to lie to anyone about anything at anytime seems to be the only perquisite for a managerial role at PFG. +When it comes to pay and promotions, believe NOTHING your manager tells you. Absolutely nothing. These decisions are the practices group's, not HR's. Don't let them convince you otherwise and hold them accountable to at least explain the situation if you are unhappy.

1.0
10 Oct 2016

Geriatric Lord of the Flies

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Starting base pay is competitive for junior workers, however don't count on ever seeing a pay increase, promotion, or competitive bonus. On the bright side, the acquisition might inject new management who might have a clue how to run a business and treat/motivate employees. It would be hard to do a worse job than the current management team.

Cons

The firm's day to day governance structure can most aptly be compared to a geriatric rendition of Lord of the Flies. There are few rules. What rules do exist are selectively applied and change every five minutes. There are too many over-sized egos at the top of the firm and not enough work/resources/territory/money to go around. They should give hazard pay for working under some of the managers here. HR and senior management frequently turn a blind eye to appallingly abusive conduct and bullying by senior employees. Junior employees are shown absolutely no respect or appreciation. Complete dedication and loyalty is demanded by the firm but is rarely reciprocated. Employees have been fleeing in droves. Selective layoffs/firings are also underway. Advancement is very difficult if not impossible (unless of course your father is an MD or on the board of an international bank in which case you'll be on the fast track to the top). With a large number of senior employees on the bench, there are few opportunities for junior staff to take on increased responsibilities. There is absolutely no investment in employees. There is no mentoring. There is no training. I'm unaware of a single industry event attended by a junior employee. Bonuses are disappearing, and pay has been frozen for years. The work itself isn't very stimulating. Even if you are lucky enough to get staffed on an interesting project, as a junior employee you are likely to spend most of your time preparing expense reports, invoices, or project plans with few opportunities to build industry specific expertise or gain transferable skills. To echo other reviews, management has very little ethics or integrity when it comes to either its business practices or its treatment of its employees. Employees are frequently mandated to push worthless software products on their client relationships to the embarrassment of everyone involved. There is no end to the squandering of money. No matter how slow business is, the CEO will continue to hire high priced advisors who neither do or bring in work. Millions have been spent on horrid modern artwork for the offices. Private jets whisk MDs to executive retreats in Napa Valley. The CEO refuses to travel by anything other than private jet. At the same time, it was recently announced that bonuses would not even be paid in 2016. Morale has been abysmal and nearly everyone is looking for an exit including, apparently, the founder.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 202 Reviews

Glassdoor has 266 Promontory Financial Group reviews submitted anonymously by Promontory Financial Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Promontory Financial Group is right for you.