employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Samagra Development Associates

Is this your company?

Samagra Development Associates Reviews

2.5

31% would recommend to a friend

(116 total reviews)

Gaurav Goel

39% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Samagra Development Associates has an employee rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars, based on 116 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Samagra Development Associates employee rating is 33% below average for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

116 reviews
2.0
9 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- High ownership of your work - Very high exposure to senior govt. leadership and voice in decision-making - Execution / implementation heavy work leading to operator-based learning - Amazing people in general - young company - Good place to start for a fresh undergrad - Projects are based in capital T-2 cities in general (could be a con for some) - Structured feedback and training sessions (partially a con as well, details below) - Accomodation sorted with good guest houses, house helps and house cooks - Good projects in general in impact space - Good pay in impact space

Cons

- Extremely penny-pinching / cheap company for a firm which expects 60 hours a week from its employee and makes profits. Examples: 1) Centrally managed Google-form to book flight tickets, where the admin will book the cheapest flight for you (with no food and seat selection allowed) irrespective of your timing preference. If your flight gets delayed - you'll be stuck as the admin will create chaos for booking another flight (which would obviously be costlier). They pressurize you to book flights A MONTH in advance - and call you out if you don't for whatever reasons. 2. Food allowance : INR 300 per meal (shameful, to say the least). Plus there are tens of conditions to claiming food allowance, for e.g., it cannot be in your base location (even though you're traveling), it cannot be a snack item (e.g., chocolates), and so on. 3. If you unknowingly claim something as expense due to lack of policy knowledge, they cut the claimed amount from your salary as a "penalty". 4. The monthly townhall is done in a basement, with steel chairs stacked up right against each other, with unbearable suffocation in summers. This is for a 9 hours crammed day. 5. Hotel per night cap is INR 2,500 - 3,000 (shameful, again). Even an NGO treats you better. 6. Gives 6 flybacks per year from your project base location to Delhi ONLY, that is, 1 flyback every 2 months to Delhi, even though your home might be somewhere else. The only Delhi part wasn't changed despite several requests from all employees (for reasons beyond anyone's understanding) 7. The firm does not provide laptop and MS-Office suite to consultants! You're expected to get you own - Extremely top-down, with hardly any place for logical dissent. What CEO says is the word in most cases (even on topics where he has zero knowledge of ground). Even senior leadership who don't agree with the CEO have been asked to leave - Too many irrational processes, which are just forced down on everyone and centrally tracked by admin. Examples: 1) Weekly planning and reviews - 2 hours planning on Monday and 2 hours review on Friday, every week 2) Monthly planning and reviews - 4 hours planning at start of month and 4 hours review end of month, every month 3) Quarterly planning and reviews - 6 hours of planning at start of quarter and 6 hours of review at the end of quarter, every quarter 4)Team Pulse - wherein the entire team including PL sits and tell how they're feeling (as if they'll be honest) 5) Team Feedback - where the entire team including PL sits and everyone gives feedback (good and bad, compulsory) on everyone (creates trauma for most) 6) PC Coaching - a 2-3 years overall experienced guy will provide you feedback every 2 weeks, even though there hasn't been much done in 2 weeks. This is centrally tracked and therefore "must be done" 7) PL Coaching - valuable, but again implemented as a process 8) Compulsory 2 district visits per month - even though your project doesn't need district visits at all and you can spend the time on other productive work 9) Townhall - every month where the leaders presents about their work and everyone listens - A profitable social impact company, where the CEO expects employees to work for national building and social causes, makes profits as a company, but don't want employees to have perks or have that lens at all - Extreme favouritism by CEO, picks and promotes whoever he deems fit, fires whoever he deems fit - Appraisals are highly based on "feelings" of your lead, and you cannot do much about it - If you an MBA, avoid this firm like a plague. They fired 25% of the the first batch of MBAs they hired from top colleges within 3 months giving reasons like "cultural fit". They didn't give hikes to MBAs because "they're already being paid highly" (leadership's words) - Highly inconsiderate to employees, rejects valid requests veiled as "expected sacrifices from the employees"

1.0
5 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some bit of learning curve which is not worth the cons, even in the smallest way.

Cons

Why the firm is extremely toxic, no one should work in such an environment - 1. Not for women at all a. The firm has no policy in place that gives any thought to making the workplace inclusive. It does not respect or acknowledge any life stage and there is no flexibility at all. On questioning the leadership, the response you get is that they will take it up on a case to case basis which means they will decide based on favouritism to the people they like, and manipulate folks they don’t like. b. Program locations are changed on the whim of the leadership with no regard to the employees’ requests. The worst part is that they won’t be upfront about their decisions but keep the employee waiting and guessing due to their manipulative conversations. This can be extremely mentally exhausting. 2. Manipulative management a. Every conversation from the leadership comes along with a subtext. Nothing is clearly defined, and this is done intentionally. It leaves room to change or complicate discussions later, especially at the time of application, in ways that serve their own interests. So anything that you engage with the firm for starting from your salary breakdown, bonus, promotion, location etc. you need to be ready for some other narrative coming your way at the time of application. And that narrative mostly won’t work in your favour. 3. Toxic work culture, curated to break a person’s confidence a. Employees will be ridiculed for their work at some point for sure. b. The leadership would camouflage their silly comments, derogatory way of speaking, and disrespect under perfectionism. They would make you feel that you are going through this since it is your fault, that you are not upto speed and they are somehow contributing to your upskilling through this. c. They would break your confidence by instilling fear for each weekly review and appraisal conversation. 4. Trust does not exist at all amongst the management or with juniors 5. Fake glassdoor reviews pushed to manipulate scores a. There is a template that can be seen in the positive reviews, which is created by the firm and pushed out anonymously b. If anyone has had a relatively good experience, it is solely because of the government official they have worked with and not because of anyone in the leadership at the firm. 6. Favouriteism is the way of working, narcissism is their manifesto a. Mentioning this again because some actors openly exploit others and we know them as goons, while Samagra is a more dangerous firm that disguises self-serving actions as “nation building.” Why the firm is harming the social sector - 1. Only competition, no collaboration - a. They just don’t want to collaborate but compete with others on everything b. They wouldn’t share since they want to monetize as much as possible 2. Follows only ‘yes sir culture’ with the government 3. Brands itself as a consulting firm, while in reality employees work as a PMU that works on operational tasks given by the government 4. Try to monetize or sell public goods which are built from funds received from the ecosystem 5. Most concerning is how they frame this as “nation building” to attract high-performing individuals, only to put them through poor experiences and unhealthy cultures. This often leaves people disillusioned and averse to the social sector altogether, which ultimately does a serious disservice to the sector itself.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 116 Reviews

Glassdoor has 126 Samagra Development Associates reviews submitted anonymously by Samagra Development Associates employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Samagra Development Associates is right for you.