YCP Solidiance Reviews

3.5

69% would recommend to a friend

(119 total reviews)

62% positive business outlook

YCP Solidiance has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 119 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The YCP Solidiance employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

119 reviews
2.0
8 Oct 2021

Flat Hierarchy, not forward looking

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- lots of exposure as junior - junior face high responsibilities

Cons

- most partners care only about money, little about growth of team, and tend to squeeze - projects claimed to be making business impacts but just running back end operations for clients, doing dirty work for clients - performance reviews are placed on curve even with different projects across same rank (why is there a common benchmark when comparisons are not a-to-a?) - operations team is marginalized within the firm

1.0
6 Jun 2025

Not Recommended

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Global Mobility Potential: As a relatively young Japanese consulting firm, YCP has shown a strong commitment to international expansion, particularly in Asia. This offers Japanese employees more opportunities for overseas assignments and relocation compared to many other Japanese companies. * Team-Dependent Culture: The company's culture and specific work content are highly dependent on the individual teams and projects. If you're fortunate enough to be assigned to a supportive supervisor or an engaging project, your experience might be more positive.

Cons

* Misaligned Expectations for Management Consulting: YCP positions itself as a management consulting firm focused on strategy and principal investments. However, it's crucial for prospective employees to understand that this is vastly different from the experience offered by established top-tier management consulting firms like MBB. Entering with such expectations will likely lead to significant disappointment. * Work-Life Balance and Compensation Discrepancy: While the long hours and intense work pressure are comparable to those in traditional management consulting, the benefits are not. Unlike leading firms that offer competitive compensation, a culture of mentorship, high-caliber colleagues, and project-based flexibility for time off (especially for members under manager level), YCP falls short. Compensation is lower, the overall skill level of employees is often not as high, and the strong Japanese corporate culture makes taking time off difficult. * Exploitative Practices: The company exhibits a concerning tendency to extract as much as possible from its employees. Upon my departure, despite having over a month of accrued paid leave, I was unable to utilize it, nor was I compensated for it. Frankly, I had lost the will to even negotiate with the company. * Questionable Employee Quality and Leadership Ethos: While recent hires of younger talent from other firms tend to possess better ethics and interpersonal skills, the leadership team, especially in Southeast Asia and India, frequently displays unfair or discriminatory behavior. It was particularly disheartening to witness Japanese partners making disparaging remarks about Southeast Asian or Indian individuals and countries. * Limited Growth for Local Hires: For Japanese nationals, there might be a path to promotion if they gain favor with influential Japanese partners. However, locally hired employees face extremely limited opportunities for advancement and salary increases, making it a very narrow career path. * Communication Challenges for Japanese Expats: Many Japanese expatriates assigned overseas often have limited English proficiency, making work-related communication challenging. This language barrier also complicates building rapport with local colleagues or supervisors who could sponsor their promotions. Socializing heavily might be the only way to gain favor.

4.0
14 Mar 2019

Intern

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Here is an unbiased review based purely on my experience. Understanding your role: For those of you who do not know the rough value chain, it goes like this: Part 1: Intern (gathers data) --> Analyst (anlyses data, sieves important ones) --> Associate/Director (discuses with analyst, gathers insights, develop practical solutions). Part 2: Intern, Analysts and Associates (makes slides) --> Associates/Director (reviews slides, ensures logic, ensures practicality) Almost all project managers will allow the intern to participate in the data gathering, which allows us to learn a part of the consulting process. Framework learning: Framework-wise, you get to learn a few. You will understand the importance of MECE which applies to not only problem identification, but also opportunity analyses and even survey planning. This helps structure your thinking to prevent thinking in overlaps. Pretty crucial in my opinion. You will learn marketing frameworks too, since that is needed for marketing advisory projects (including business expansion). Financial modelling wise, not much. Then again this is a consulting firm. You gather data, identify pain points, gather insights, structure recommendations, create picth decks and story tell. It's not a financial advisory firm (in Singapore) Project management skills: Depending on the project manager, if you have autonomy to plan deliverables deadlines, or manage expectations, then you have learnt project management skills. I had a few. Others: If you are in an implementation project, you will learn aplenty. If you are on a research project, you will learn how to research effectively. But you must understand why you are doing the research. If you blindly just do it, you wont learn anything to be honest. Better to understand than to follow through motion. If you are on a consulting project, you will learn research, slide making (crucial), thinking, and insight gathering (very very important skillset)

Cons

Let's face it, this is a mid-small size consulting firm. If you look at it globally, it is comparable to an MNC but mid-sized. I would say, comparable to Allianz Consulting. Because of that, you will have to handle many responsibilities of a project and manage it end to end. A lot of work to do, good and bad. ALOT of market entry projects. Good to learn about many industries, but so much research to do. Alot of operational consulting such as improving sales/reducing costs for F&Bs, and alot of research-based projects. While research-based projects can lead to strategy projects, as interns, you will probably partake in the research part mainly. The good stuff goes to the Analysts/Associates... Interns do alot of saikang. But as mentioned, if you honestly understand why you are doing the saikang, then it is actually worthwhile.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 119 Reviews

Glassdoor has 232 YCP Solidiance reviews submitted anonymously by YCP Solidiance employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if YCP Solidiance is right for you.