Your "career" as a financial analyst in the Rochester COE is a joke - Financial Analyst IBM Employee Review

3.0
23 Nov 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Flexibility - Most managers will let you work from home if you are sick or if you are back in your hometown for a few days 2) 401K match is pretty solid - Dollar for dollar up to a 6% match, 100% vested after the first year 3) Health benefits are pretty good 4) The "IBM" name on your resume goes a long way 5) If you're a top performer they'll pay 100% of your tuition costs (MBA, grad degrees, etc)

Cons

1) Compensation - Base salary is downright pathetic. I counter-offered out of college and it was turned down, but decided to work for them anyway. Annual raises only go to employees with PBC 1 and 2+ ratings (roughly 2% a year). Bonuses are offered to only PBC 1 (top performers) and are about 4-5% of base salary. They COE will offer "retention bonuses" to their top performing employees ($10K in two installments of $5K over two years. Each year you are committed to stay with the company for one year. If you leave you must pay the bonus back). All of these "incentives" are a slap in the face because your base salary never really grows. 2) Growth Opportunity - From day 1 you are sold that the opportunities are endless within IBM, but in reality they are not unless you want to settle for jobs that never give you face to face exposure with middle management or senior leaders. They constantly try to sell you that the prize is going out to Somers, NY to work with the finance teams out there, but they'll give you $60k to move out there.....to NY, which is just laughable. Once you get out there you will work 60-70 hours a week, and it might take you 5 years to get to a level of income where you're just breaking even due to the market prices out there. 3) Environment - Rochester absolutely sucks and becomes depressing after the first year. If you like small towns you might object to that statement. Your first year might seem cool working with other twenty-somethings out of college, but after a few years you'll realize that an environment where people wear shorts to work and play foosball all day is not a place where you can further your career. Also, you will share an office with another co-worker that will be from 1970 and include a phone that is also from 1970. You'll get a work laptop, but you have to buy your own monitor if you want something bigger than a 13'' screen. (No joke). 4) Cost Cutting - IBM manages their expenses very closely which means you do not get the leisure of having them pay for work outings, business cards, or other sensible acts of corporate kindness when you're working on Saturday's and Sunday's. After I left the company, I was told that the Rochester COE would no longer be getting their offices cleaned or their trash taken out (employees have to take their own trash out!). So it looks like not only are you a financial analyst now, but you're a part-time janitor as well. The above might make it seem like I hate IBM, but I really do not. It's a great company....for shareholders. If you can commit three years of your life here you will become very marketable and make a decent sum of money if you opt to work elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
19 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Everyone is ready to help

Cons

I have no cons for this

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All